Mark Clattenburg

[Boz]

You'l have to claim to be an Altrincham fan then mate!

Who does the referee who claims he's an Altrincham fan, Anthony Taylor, actually support?

 

[happy]

I just wonder how many of the so-called 'elite' PiGMOL refs would have given that pen? If as many wouldn't as would, then it's inconclusive and it shouldn't be given.

We need to nail referees down and they should be required to explain every sending off and every penalty. Some of the sendings off and pens would be pretty obvious, but some, like the one yesterday would provide a very interesting explanation!!

Interviewer: Mark, can you talk us through the penalty decision?
Clattenburg: I thought it was a penalty but looking at the replay I clearly got it wrong and I apologise.
Interviewer: Thanks Mark

Fascinating stuff.

 

[david whites spike]

Just because of the sheer fact that pellegrini 'dug him out' post match tells you everything.
Don't think I've ever heard pellers speak bad of or criticise any ref or fellow manager.
Clattenburg likes big games to be about him.

 

[we are really here]

Referees should go in front of the camera and explain their thought process behind the decision making.
And yesterday no matter my bias towards city.
the first question would have been where did the ball strike sterling for the penalty?
Waited for his answer and then showed a video replay and say well you were obviously guessing as you were in no position to see it and it clearly hits him in the ribs first then bounced up and skins his elbow.
Make him out to be the cheater he is. If the refs got interviewed like that after every contentious decision, We'd soon see fairer games.
But as theyre very well protected and believe they're God's gift they're allowed to make teams drop points without punishment.
But we know it will never happen as there's to much money in the sport

 

[Bluean Common]

He needs investigating clatteringtwat , there has been racist allegations made against him this should have been investigated and the resulting findings
laid bare to public scrutiny either way somebody is guilty of at the very least bringing the game into disrepute. Although i suspect the corrupt FA like to push
this kind of thing under there carpet along with all the sordid secrets and money driven agendas .How many howlers do football supporters have to put up with /
The man is a gross incompatant and which makes his decision gross misconduct It might be a good idea for all football fans to be given some kind of judicating roll
on the appointment and dismissal of refs/ ?

 

[Burtonblue]

Interviewer: Mark, can you talk us through the penalty decision?
Clattenburg: I thought it was a penalty but looking at the replay I clearly got it wrong and I apologise.
Interviewer: Thanks Mark

Fascinating stuff.

You didn't need a bloody replay to tell he had his back turned when the ball hit him!!!!!
Liar.

 

[happy]

Referees should go in front of the camera and explain their thought process behind the decision making.
And yesterday no matter my bias towards city.
the first question would have been where did the ball strike sterling for the penalty?
Waited for his answer and then showed a video replay and say well you were obviously guessing as you were in no position to see it and it clearly hits him in the ribs first then bounced up and skins his elbow.
Make him out to be the cheater he is. If the refs got interviewed like that after every contentious decision, We'd soon see fairer games.
But as theyre very well protected and believe they're God's gift they're allowed to make teams drop points without punishment.
But we know it will never happen as there's to much money in the sport

No, you'd see referees leaving the game in their droves for fear of being called a cheat for every single mistake they made.

A nonsense idea.

 

[We're not really here]

I'm sure you're a delightful chap, well educated and holding down an excellent position; sadly, as I don't know you personally I can only really go on the evidence to hand, you posted some drivel relating to a post that I had already responded to so forgive me for appearing short.

So you consider my post as "drivel" and therefore see fit to be insulting? You need to have a word with yourself.

 

[happy]

You didn't need a bloody replay to tell he had his back turned when the ball hit him!!!!!
Liar.

Oh good grief, in order for the referee to comment he would need to see a replay to decide conclusively that he'd made a mistake, are people really this dumb or is it some sort of convention you're organising?

 

[Mikejl]

Well I don't wish to labour the point but if there was a scrap of evidence pointing towards corruption in the game at this level then these very same journalists would be all over it in a heartbeat...a story like this would be career defining for any journalist and in these days of decreased 'paper sales it would be manna from heaven for the press.

Naive I think, a significant proportion of these so - called journalists are pretty much on the pay roll of the traditional big clubs, they act as mouthpieces for Rags, Dippers, Arse, Chelsea & Spuds, for them to call out corruption in football would open a can of worms. The media is as corrupt as many others in the establishment (just look at how they feed out the political agenda) never mind football.

Re yesterday, lot of smoke about Clattenberg in the past, he makes too many poor decisions against us & in favour of certain clubs in other matches for it to be incompetence or coincidence, as do a number of others Rag Taylor, Lee Mason , a Roger East.Etc...

As a club we should be clear & vocal in saying that he shouldn't be anywhere near our club on match day, that in itself may send out a statement to those other officials that we have had our bellyful of getting a raw deal, which this season & last we have had a shocking run of 'bad luck'

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Interviewer: Mark, can you talk us through the penalty decision?
Clattenburg: I thought it was a penalty but looking at the replay I clearly got it wrong and I apologise.
Interviewer: Thanks Mark

Fascinating stuff.

happy pills , it wasnt a penalty , get over it.

 

[Burtonblue]

Oh good grief, in order for the referee to comment he would need to see a replay to decide conclusively that he'd made a mistake, are people really this dumb or is it some sort of convention you're organising?

Who do you support fella? Are you Clattenberg?
Surely he must have seen Sterling had his back to the ball when it was struck!
Or maybe he wasn't looking that way at all!
In fact, come to think of it, he can't have been looking at all if he gave the pen.
As for the dumb comments you can keep those to yourself.

 

[malg]

If I had several billion in the bank, I would have private detectives monitoring everything he does, people he see's, and phone conversations he has.

Nope. I'd just pay some Russian spy to slot the fucker........

 

[happy]

So you consider my post as "drivel" and therefore see fit to be insulting? You need to have a word with yourself.

No,

happy pills , it wasnt a penalty , get over it.

It was an incorrect decision, an appalling mistake, it was never a penalty in a million years and you'd have to be an idiot to argue otherwise, at no point have I said it was a pen

Who do you support fella? Are you Clattenberg?
Surely he must have seen Sterling had his back to the ball when it was struck!
Or maybe he wasn't looking that way at all!
In fact, come to think of it, he can't have been looking at all if he gave the pen.
As for the dumb comments you can keep those to yourself.

You're correct I am Mark Clattenburg and you sniffed me out you little raccoon you, I joined this site in 2009 and I've been playing the long game just waiting for my moment and now here it is...congratulations, you've won the internet.

 

[Burtonblue]

No,


It was an incorrect decision, an appalling mistake, it was never a penalty in a million years and you'd have to be an idiot to argue otherwise, at no point have I said it was a pen



You're correct I am Mark Clattenburg and you sniffed me out you little raccoon you, I joined this site in 2009 and I've been playing the long game just waiting for my moment and now here it is...congratulations, you've won the internet.

Oh good
I love a bit of irony

 

[Colin Bell's Boots]

I don't think it's asking too much to come and explain after a match, as a matter of course, why X or Y was sent off, and why Team A got a pen. It could be added to, so that Rigger East and Pawson could explain why the fouls on Sterling and Nava didn't warrant a penalty kick! The fact we don't have this will lead many, including myself, to think that there is something that the PL, The Farce and PiGMOL would rather leave on the pitch!

You are absolutely right in what you say.

The chances of it ever happening though must be minimal at best, because the FA are like the Vatican at keeping their dirty washing out of the public eye, and with good reason too I suspect.

At the risk of repeating myself, yet again, I believe that there is corruption inherent in the FA and PL , along the lines of EUFA and FIFA , because of the vast sums of money involved, and the human nature of greed.

Clattenburg has had history of being in financial difficulty ?

 

[goalmole]

The fact the FA are not punishing Pellegrini for his post match comments makes me highly suspicious they understand just how awful a decision that was. They do not want to hang Twattenberg out to dry by stoking the already considerable fire he has lit by making the story linger on.
On the plus side I very much doubt he will be reffing one of our games anywhere in the near future given the current strength of feeling that the fucker at best guessed it was a penalty. I personally think it was more sinister than a guess....

The **** would never guess in our favour though, would he. It's not his job to guess. His job is to make a considered decision based on what he actually see's. I'd even like to know what he based his guesswork on. Sterling jumped up with his back to the ball and the ball hit him in the back of his ribs.
Never a penalty in a million years and you didn't need to be an elite ref to work that out. That's not to say Clattenburg is anywhere near being an elite ref.
Cheating ****.

 

[Bluean Common]

You are absolutely right in what you say.

The chances of it ever happening though must be minimal at best, because the FA are like the Vatican at keeping their dirty washing out of the public eye, and with good reason too I suspect.

At the risk of repeating myself, yet again, I believe that there is corruption inherent in the FA and PL , along the lines of EUFA and FIFA , because of the vast sums of money involved, and the human nature of greed.

Clattenburg has had history of being in financial difficulty ?

He needs investigating

 

[goalmole]

No, you'd see referees leaving the game in their droves for fear of being called a cheat for every single mistake they made.

A nonsense idea.

Good. If they can't substantiate their decisions, the sooner they fuck off, the better.

 

[happy]

Good. If they can't substantiate their decisions, the sooner they fuck off, the better.

And who would officiate? Perhaps we could let the players do it themselves and then we could introduce fly-goalies and next goal wins...you haven't really thought it through have you