oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
blueincy said:
I`ve never phoned any sort of shit like this.At my age I still try and put old one penny coins in the fooking call box phones.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Match of the Day - 2014/15
- Thread starter malg
- Start date
I`ve never phoned any sort of shit like this.At my age I still try and put old one penny coins in the fooking call box phones.
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
FWIW. Aguero's was a cracking goal, but i preferred Fernandihno's. The best goal of the lot
was Barkely's imo. Its just down to preference and i wouldn't get to upset over who wins goal of the month.
It doesn't count for anything.
was Barkely's imo. Its just down to preference and i wouldn't get to upset over who wins goal of the month.
It doesn't count for anything.
quiet_riot
Well-Known Member
Pretty appalled with the highlights of the City/Everton match on Saturday. Shouldn't be surprised I know, but the MOTD package painted a totally different picture of the game than the one I watched at 3pm!
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
quiet_riot said:Pretty appalled with the highlights of the City/Everton match on Saturday. Shouldn't be surprised I know, but the MOTD package painted a totally different picture of the game than the one I watched at 3pm!
Well, I'm shocked, qr! Those BBC editors work tirelessly to present a programme that truly reflects . . . . . No, I don't believe the shit I've written!!
prestonibbo_mcfc said:FWIW. Aguero's was a cracking goal, but i preferred Fernandihno's. The best goal of the lot
was Barkely's imo. Its just down to preference and i wouldn't get to upset over who wins goal of the month.
It doesn't count for anything.
Would have said Barnes personally. But, as you say, down to preference.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
It is. As a further (and completely insane) aside, the girl in that video from 1983 is now Editor of 'Cosmopolitan' magazine.bluethrunthru said:gordondaviesmoustache said:One or two.ArdwickBlue said:You went out with a girl?
Just as an aside is that The Safety Dance by Men Without Hats?
I loved the analysis of the Rags. They were desperate to show how the tactic of lumping the ball to the Spitting Elbow (S.E) didn't work. They said it didn't work because the three midfielders did not 'box' him ! It was explained that meant standing close enough to him to pick up the knock downs when he won a challenge. They then went on to show four clips from the match where S.E. jumped and challenged for the ball, in three of the challenges the Southampton defender casually headed the ball away totally unconcerned about what S.E. was doing.
So not only was the tactic not working because the 'box' men were nowhere near him but it wasn't working because S.E. didn't have the ability to win the ball in the first place. A fact that appeared totally lost on the pundit.
So not only was the tactic not working because the 'box' men were nowhere near him but it wasn't working because S.E. didn't have the ability to win the ball in the first place. A fact that appeared totally lost on the pundit.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Motty said:prestonibbo_mcfc said:FWIW. Aguero's was a cracking goal, but i preferred Fernandihno's. The best goal of the lot
was Barkely's imo. Its just down to preference and i wouldn't get to upset over who wins goal of the month.
It doesn't count for anything.
Would have said Barnes personally. But, as you say, down to preference.
I think we'd agree knobheads kick would be bottom of the pile.
Mr.Banks
Well-Known Member
Blue Mist said:I loved the analysis of the Rags. They were desperate to show how the tactic of lumping the ball to the Spitting Elbow (S.E) didn't work. They said it didn't work because the three midfielders did not 'box' him ! It was explained that meant standing close enough to him to pick up the knock downs when he won a challenge. They then went on to show four clips from the match where S.E. jumped and challenged for the ball, in three of the challenges the Southampton defender casually headed the ball away totally unconcerned about what S.E. was doing.
So not only was the tactic not working because the 'box' men were nowhere near him but it wasn't working because S.E. didn't have the ability to win the ball in the first place. A fact that appeared totally lost on the pundit.
Thought Barton got a nice sly dig in by saying about butthead, 'if he's some kind of Supercoach he needs to sort a plan b out.' Or words to that effect, made me laugh anyway.
Mr.Banks said:Blue Mist said:I loved the analysis of the Rags. They were desperate to show how the tactic of lumping the ball to the Spitting Elbow (S.E) didn't work. They said it didn't work because the three midfielders did not 'box' him ! It was explained that meant standing close enough to him to pick up the knock downs when he won a challenge. They then went on to show four clips from the match where S.E. jumped and challenged for the ball, in three of the challenges the Southampton defender casually headed the ball away totally unconcerned about what S.E. was doing.
So not only was the tactic not working because the 'box' men were nowhere near him but it wasn't working because S.E. didn't have the ability to win the ball in the first place. A fact that appeared totally lost on the pundit.
Thought Barton got a nice sly dig in by saying about butthead, 'if he's some kind of Supercoach he needs to sort a plan b out.' Or words to that effect, made me laugh anyway.
I heard and laughed at Barton's dig but I disagree with him. TT has sorted Plan B out, Plan B is kick it up to the Spiting Elbow, his problem is he hasn't got a plan fookin' A !