west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,304
Jonathan Pearce called West Ham's second goal Stupendous. I thought Martin Tyler had trademarked that word.
Didn't he do the same to Schmeichal at Highbury? Hypocritical ****.Ian Wright being a **** - Bravo was a penalty regardless of the fact he took the ball with his instep on the floor yet Rooney only "lets Bravo off the hook by fouling him" - sliding in from the rear like that could be a red in other circs Wright you 2 faced twat
This ^^^^
The highlights completely misrepresented how stunning we were in the first half - at least Shearer got it right
Didn't he do the same to Schmeichal at Highbury? Hypocritical ****.
Jonathan Pearce called West Ham's second goal Stupendous. I thought Martin Tyler had trademarked that word.
I know a fella that does the editing most Saturdays. Don't know if he did today but I will be asking! From what he's told me he certainly has no axe to grind and its very much just a job. He does say some pundits are better organised than others. Some will have a 'shopping list' of clips with precise times that they want which makes life easy. Others just say 'I want the footage of player x fouling player y in the second half' which is more of a ball ache. I'll see if I can get more info on the process, but obviously can't compromise the bloke on the interweb. He doesn't strike me as a football fan, let alone a rag tbh.Those highlights are exactly why this shite needs an extensive makeover. If you hadn't watched the game you'd think Shearer was talking utter bollocks. In fact, the highlights made it look like the Rags had more of the ball.
You mean Alvin stardust?Jonathan Pearce called West Ham's second goal Stupendous. I thought Martin Tyler had trademarked that word.