bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Yes but as the first one appears to relate to last season what is the relevance?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Match of the Day - 2016/17
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
Yes but as the first one appears to relate to last season what is the relevance?
Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,808
Last night's show was very insightful in terms of narratives around matches and teams
During the live commentary Guy Mowbray pretty much called every one of the major incidents how I saw them:
- City's first half excellence
- Their goal probably being more of a Stones/communication issue than a glaring Bravo howler
- Bravo getting the ball v Rooney (though it did fall into the "seen em given" category to me)
- No intent re the Otta "handball"
Then we get to the edit. Masses of the first half missed out, Bravo's fault, nailed on pen/red, handball
There is a definite narrative there with what someone saw and called live being totally changed and re-presented a few hours later
Don't care what you call it (agenda, or whatever) but its absolutely clear to me that City are being deliberately presented in a particular way for a particular purpose
Don't even get me started on Rooney!
During the live commentary Guy Mowbray pretty much called every one of the major incidents how I saw them:
- City's first half excellence
- Their goal probably being more of a Stones/communication issue than a glaring Bravo howler
- Bravo getting the ball v Rooney (though it did fall into the "seen em given" category to me)
- No intent re the Otta "handball"
Then we get to the edit. Masses of the first half missed out, Bravo's fault, nailed on pen/red, handball
There is a definite narrative there with what someone saw and called live being totally changed and re-presented a few hours later
Don't care what you call it (agenda, or whatever) but its absolutely clear to me that City are being deliberately presented in a particular way for a particular purpose
Don't even get me started on Rooney!
BlueMoonz1977
Well-Known Member
Let's see how they interpret the game yesterday on motd2
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Cayhill having a real go at the officials
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Same as they did at lunchtime,rags were robbedLet's see how they interpret the game yesterday on motd2
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Post match radio phone ins were full of Costa - dived - should have gone.... again.
MOTD - Chelsea were robbed - Cahill fouled......hmmmmm
MOTD - Chelsea were robbed - Cahill fouled......hmmmmm
DiscoSteve
Well-Known Member
Blatant foul on Cahill BUT he was caught dithering so it was his own fault - which is trying to cover up with his moon comment
BlueMoonz1977
Well-Known Member
Post match radio phone ins were full of Costa - dived - should have gone.... again.
MOTD - Chelsea were robbed - Cahill fouled......hmmmmm
To be fair Cahill for me was fouled, blatant kick on the Achilles and then another, however Costa is one diving cnut
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Mariner sees nothing again....time for him to go and ref Oldham.
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
The Cahill one was a foul don't know how the ref missed it,if that had happened to otto or stones I'd be livid ..Post match radio phone ins were full of Costa - dived - should have gone.... again.
MOTD - Chelsea were robbed - Cahill fouled......hmmmmm