Match of the Day - 2016/17

Not surprising at all, pretty standard affair for when both we and the rags win, almost as if maximising their sixth place greatness (read: mediocrity) by minimising our accomplishments.

Old Trafford is a fucking library, but no, "eerily quiet" in the Etihad. All over them in an unmitigated onslaught for the first half, better not show that and focus on attempting to corroborate the ridiculous sour grapes of Clement. 70% possession for City overall, let's ignore that and isolate the less polarising figure from the second half. Mike Dean handing out cards to City like it's Christmas while offering no protection when Swansea players repeatedly offend, let's selectively show footage to lead you to think the ref favoured City.

This doesn't happen for other clubs.

It doesn't happen to the other clubs in the title chase. We are expected to believe that CFC, Haringey Hotspurs, The Swamp Donkeys, and the Dippers have every tackle and challenge timed to perfection, such is the absence of straight red cards for serious foul play, and the lack of yellows where the likes of any ref turning up at The Etihad this season appeared to have yellow coloured confetti stuffed in each pocket. Every club's fans moan about the bias directed at their team, but let's see some of the outcomes re red and yellow cards that deprive us of our players, and a video of the top six clubs of two footed lunges that have escaped any sanction, or been 'downgraded' to yellow, or given a straight red! Such a video would never get aired, certainly on the sports channels.
 
I am not offended as such but a complete character assasination(sp)of her wasn't really called for
MOTD's days are over for me,i learn nothing from them at all anymore,it has it's pet clubs and we are not one of them

Fair enough.

At least we can agree on MOTD. Well past its sell by date and as for not being one of the pet clubs, I suppose it goes with the territory. We have upset the cosy apple cart and they don't like it one little bit. Their pain is palpable.

Sod them, and the horse they rode in on.

PS It's "assassination" :-) (sorry lol)
 
Fair enough.

At least we can agree on MOTD. Well past its sell by date and as for not being one of the pet clubs, I suppose it goes with the territory. We have upset the cosy apple cart and they don't like it one little bit. Their pain is palpable.

Sod them, and the horse they rode in on.

PS It's "assassination" :-) (sorry lol)
I tried to spell it several times then gave up lol
 
Whatever is happening at the BBC is obviously driven by a rag at the top, or more than one, the bias is so blatant, as is the sucking up to the rags and it seeps through at every pore not just MOTD. How many programmes have they run now blowing the rag trumpet?? Forgive me if some of these weren't on the BBC as they all seem to merge into one but I remember the Class of 92, A couple on rug head Rooney, the Salford one which was in effect glorifying the rags again and incredibly one on the sister in law shagger on taking charge at the toilet for a couple of months for fuck's sake!

Now this is bad enough but when they give us hardly any praise whatsoever for anything and always seem to be getting sly digs in enough is enough! Fortunately for these fuckers we can't really stop paying the licence fee or it would be the first cancellation on the list!!
 
Fair enough.

At least we can agree on MOTD. Well past its sell by date and as for not being one of the pet clubs, I suppose it goes with the territory. We have upset the cosy apple cart and they don't like it one little bit. Their pain is palpable.

Sod them, and the horse they rode in on.

PS It's "assassination" :-) (sorry lol)
Before picking up on spelling mistakes, you might want to change "new" to "knew" in the second paragraph of your original rant. :-)
 
Do you really have to run her down like that,she is the anchor and gets given her script and questions to ask the 2 who do know about football,it's what presenters do male or female,what she did on another show and when she was a gymnast and even what she looks like are not relevant,wind your neck in

I love the way you defend all the woman presenters on our screens,most is said tongue in cheek on here,and you know not that it really matters I hear you say,but be honest lass,football and football forums are male dominated,taking piss and generally being sexist,myself included.

I do get your Emmeline Pankhurst scenario,I really do,we know you are a lady/woman/girl,but trying to defend them by telling posters to wind their neck in and that ain't right either.

I know you can cuss and swear on here like the best of us,but you got to draw a line somewhere kid
 
I love the way you defend all the woman presenters on our screens,most is said tongue in cheek on here,and you know not that it really matters I hear you say,but be honest lass,football and football forums are male dominated,taking piss and generally being sexist,myself included.

I do get your Emmeline Pankhurst scenario,I really do,we know you are a lady/woman/girl,but trying to defend them by telling posters to wind their neck in and that ain't right either.

I know you can cuss and swear on here like the best of us,but you got to draw a line somewhere kid
Thank you for your contribution as useless as it was
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.