Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,372
MOTD wanted that penalty given and didn't seem to think the offside call was worth talking about. They also seem to think getting in behind is as good as a goal, when our defence could just as likely have cut out the cross that would have to come after getting in behind. None of those would have led to an immediate shot, bar one which was an acute angle(low chance of scoring) and Dias is immense at cutting out low crosses across the 6 yard box. Their chances came from counters and mistakes from City with the ball at the back. City didn't have any 4 on 4 situations because they defended with everything they had in the final 3rd.
I can't stand Jenas either, whenever he covers anything to do with City, the bias seeps out of his every pore. Not only that, he does it with a conceited smugness too, as if to say: "Yeah, I hate City, so what? My paymasters will probably give me a raise"
I can't stand Jenas either, whenever he covers anything to do with City, the bias seeps out of his every pore. Not only that, he does it with a conceited smugness too, as if to say: "Yeah, I hate City, so what? My paymasters will probably give me a raise"
Last edited: