Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 10,204
When she expressed surprise at the added time “does it mean 1!”I like having this pundit, she isn't full of bias and hate like the guys.
When she expressed surprise at the added time “does it mean 1!”I like having this pundit, she isn't full of bias and hate like the guys.
tbh it looks like he has added on time for their 'injuries', if he had added it all on properly the game wouldn't finish until sunday night3 mins in the first half with Ederson injured for 4, 10 mins in the second with no one injured? We all know the reason is nil nil at the end of the first half and City winning at the end of 90 minutes.
Anyone any clue why? Because otherwise people are just pulling this conclusion out of their arse rather than assuming Pep is being a **** to him.Jack must have been on the naughty stool?
Wouldn't surprise me.Maybe his head hasn’t been quite right after the burglary?
So could of I…I could have played in net today in my heels instead of Ederson, would have made zero difference to the scoreline. Hes had absolutely nothing to do