Match Thread | Man City vs WBA (21/04/14)

Status
Not open for further replies.
flb said:
SWP's back said:
flb said:
Why the fuck was he even on the pitch second half? 3-1 and coasting, he's just come back from an injury.

Able deputy in Milner on the bench who's more than capable against a tepid poor WBA side.


Pellagrini doesn't fucking learn at all.

Any glimmer of hope of winning the league has just gone down the toilet.

What fucking point is he trying to make by making Silva play 90 minutes?


We won't win fuck all with this fucking clown in charge
We already have you twat.

Now sod off with your degree in 20:20 hindsight as you sound like a fucking child.


So it's right to play Silva who's carried an ankle injury when 3-1 up against a shit WBA?

It's his other leg you fool.
 
Plaything of the gods said:
happy said:
HolisticJim said:
Is it ever his day?
He's a fookin donkey.

20 odd goals this season and in the top 10 Premier League goal scorers per minutes on pitch ever. Yeah, he's a donkey.
Yes, he is a donkey. writing was on the wall this season right from the Toon game. If he was any good he'd be on 30 goals, up there with Knasher.

If he was any good he'd be as good as the top Premier League scorer?...give your head a wobble lad.
 
Plaything of the gods said:
happy said:
HolisticJim said:
Is it ever his day?
He's a fookin donkey.

20 odd goals this season and in the top 10 Premier League goal scorers per minutes on pitch ever. Yeah, he's a donkey.
Yes, he is a donkey. writing was on the wall this season right from the Toon game. If he was any good he'd be on 30 goals, up there with Knasher.
The stretch of consistent games he got he played every 3 days, with no rotation because everyone else was injured. Delivered 20+ goals, played great against Bayern and Barca, defo donkey..
 
SWP's back said:
Damocles said:
taconinja said:
He's always like this.

We're looking at it.
You should certainly look at any poster that thinks we'll "win nothing with this clown".....

There's a fine line though between a City fan badly expression frustration and a complete bellend. I think he falls into the earlier category if I'm honest but I'm a soft arse.
 
SWP's back said:
flb said:
SWP's back said:
We already have you twat.

Now sod off with your degree in 20:20 hindsight as you sound like a fucking child.


So it's right to play Silva who's carried an ankle injury when 3-1 up against a shit WBA?
With 22 minutes to play when goal difference may come into it?

Yes.

It's obviously not a recurrence and it's the doctors and the player, not Pellegrini, that can assess if a player is ready to return.


We look flat without him, that was the point, rather he miss 45 minutes tonight than the rest of the season.
 
flb said:
SWP's back said:
flb said:
So it's right to play Silva who's carried an ankle injury when 3-1 up against a shit WBA?
With 22 minutes to play when goal difference may come into it?

Yes.

It's obviously not a recurrence and it's the doctors and the player, not Pellegrini, that can assess if a player is ready to return.


We look flat without him, that was the point, rather he miss 45 minutes tonight than the rest of the season.
20:20 hindsight as I say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top