FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Ahhhhh.....well that makes fucking sense!It’s Danny Mills for crying out loud
Ahhhhh.....well that makes fucking sense!It’s Danny Mills for crying out loud
Tbf I don't think he was referencing Cancelo when he mentioned ability, Redknapp got confused by that too.That twat Carragher on Cancelo's goal; "that's nothing to do with ability". Can you imagine if that was Salah ?
Anyway, it may be churlish but I'd expect a bit more of our front 3 in the second half.
That too.and he was looking for it
Usually don't follow match threads, but I am in a bed with laptop after the 'booster' messed me up, feel worse than catching Covid, I am shocked at the level of negativity here in spite of being two nil up. Is it always like this?
He was talking about the defending, not Cancelo. He finished the sentence with “that’s nothing to do with ability… Sunday league players can stand up straight and not turn their backs”.
Very poor punditry, playing to the red tops, I take that back, that is exactly how you hang onto your sky punditry job - ask Mike Summerbee.Piss of Defoe and Redknapp you soft spursy cunts that isn't a penalty in a million years
"WIPES HIM OUT"
Ederson barely touches him and the ball had LONG gone.
This is what happens when you have pundits who all don't like City....... biased crap.
So it’s not a foul because it’s sooo late?Piss of Defoe and Redknapp you soft spursy cunts that isn't a penalty in a million years
"WIPES HIM OUT"
Ederson barely touches him and the ball had LONG gone.
This is what happens when you have pundits who all don't like City....... biased crap.
True.Rodri’s was better than both imo