It also means he doesn't trust them enough to see out Ipswich two goals up.
Yeah the fact he bought Stones on and not Nunes when Kovacic came off speaks volumes. Playing a promoted team and two goals up.
It also means he doesn't trust them enough to see out Ipswich two goals up.
He’s just not that good mate, no idea why we went for him. He’s going to be trouble as well. Should never buy a player that goes on strike, says everythingYou'd have said the same thing about Nathan ake and Akanji using that criteria alone.
In fairness, much of the time Kalvin has been with us, he's been unavailable due to injury. We also seem to have had enormous difficulty offloading him. Also, I'm not sure how we can say that Nunes's improvement is 'inevitable' should he stay. I'd be the first to say that players should be cut a little slack and given time to bed in; an obvious example being Ake who was slaughtered initially by many on this forum. However, where Nunes is concerned (and Phillips incidentally), they've had adequate opportunity in my opinion to show us what they're made of already but repeatedly failed to cut it. That said, he might not leave, he might indeed be offered further opportunities and, who knows, the player we hoped he was might emerge. We just don't know. As things stand though, I wouldn't be heartbroken to see him move on, particularly if it frees up a place for one of our own such as McAtee. Either way, I wish the lad well.Leave him to Athleti if it be, I'd rather his inevitable improvement not bite us should he sign with a league rival. I still think we should keep him. He's only been here a season... we offered Kalvin at least twice as long.
Do you honestly think he'd strengthen them?I'd rather keep him than let Liverpool buy him, unless he was going to weaken them
I try not to think about them :-)Do you honestly think he'd strengthen them?