McManaman...CL Final

[Barcon]

I watched the CBS coverage. If there's an alternative to BT, I'll go with it.

I put BT on for the pre and post game. DAZN usually just has the game and nothing else.

 

[Revolver]

I thought he was fine on Saturday. I didn’t hear any snide comments about City and he was professional.

Don’t expect cheer leaders (Lescott fulfilled this role regardless), just informed opinion.

 

[jimharri]

I put BT on for the pre and post game. DAZN usually just has the game and nothing else.

There is an added attraction on CBS, of course.



The verbal jousting between Micah and Carragher, obviously.

;-)

 

[Barcon]

I thought he was fine on Saturday. I didn’t hear any snide comments about City and he was professional.

Don’t expect cheer leaders (Lescott fulfilled this role regardless), just informed opinion.

I don't want cheerleaders either mate, but an accent that is tolerable is nice.

 

[Ducado]

If only we had a thread to discuss the media or the game

 

[Bayblue]

How this chunt gets a job as a co-commentator is beyond me, he never says anything remotely incisive when compared to Neville and Carragher. Clearly, as City fans we have issues with the latter two but at least if they are on co-comms they will, more than likely, spot something interesting in the game, tactics-wise...McManaman on the other hand, it's just a stream of drivel and cliches..."let's hope he's alright"...etc etc etc.
Main point is though, I'm pretty sure the little twat excitedly shouted "goal" in the background, just after Ederson makes the save and it's headed past the post by Dias, then tried to backtrack immediately.

Agree with this. He’s normally quite harmless but offers nothing in terms of any tactical insight.

 

[DD6028]

I'd rather listen to foreign commentary or none at all in modern times they're so poor

Loved the old commentators like Moore and Clough years ago spoke when needed and never over talked analysed the game