Media bias against City

[City Raider]

Aguero and Toure would be prem legends if they played elsewhere. I'm not even sure the bias is deliberate, it's just decades of covering certain clubs in a different way.

 

[eastmanc]

Don't give a flying one what anybody says on this thread, THERE IS AN AGENDA. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it, and no I'm not paranoid.

 

[Ric]

oh oh i bet you wouldn't say that about United fans

I have no idea what United fans think, but if they took every bit of negative coverage about their club as being an "agenda" then I'd think they were being ridiculously paranoid too.

You just hobnob with a few hack journos like the one you interviewed for that terrible piece you posted on here months back so you deny all agenda claims because you think it would make you look silly to them, thats my opinion anyway. Can't see how a owner of the biggest city forum could be so blind to all the examples, call its forum members "paranoid" and throw your cap in with the likes of dd who defended ex rag players slagging off our club on national tv. I think even if the sports governing body changed the rules at the last minute to make us fail "rules" dreamt up by our main rivals you probabally would still thinuk there is no agenda against city, oh wait.

Haha, "hobnob" with a few journalists?! I don't know any of them, and am pretty consistent in criticising the majority of them for their coverage of City. I just think that if you take any slight criticism of our club as being an "agenda" then you're being a bit soft. Big clubs attract negative headlines. You'd better get used to it, because it's not going away. Better to be talked about than ignored.

 

[Marvin]

MOTD have only so many minutes per team. CFC if they care were probably well unhappy that their game and title celebrations received such little coverage.

 

[CelesteItis]

oh oh i bet you wouldn't say that about United fans

I have no idea what United fans think, but if they took every bit of negative coverage about their club as being an "agenda" then I'd think they were being ridiculously paranoid too.

You just hobnob with a few hack journos like the one you interviewed for that terrible piece you posted on here months back so you deny all agenda claims because you think it would make you look silly to them, thats my opinion anyway. Can't see how a owner of the biggest city forum could be so blind to all the examples, call its forum members "paranoid" and throw your cap in with the likes of dd who defended ex rag players slagging off our club on national tv. I think even if the sports governing body changed the rules at the last minute to make us fail "rules" dreamt up by our main rivals you probably would still think there is no agenda against City, oh wait.

+1

 

[GaudinoMotors]

MOTD have only so many minutes per team. CFC if they care were probably well unhappy that their game and title celebrations received such little coverage.

They've had weeks of it - It's not exactly news

 

[Blueknows]

Just accept it lads, these fuckers will never give us the credit that we deserve. Really doesn't come as a suprise with the aguero thing at all, how many times has our club outperformed other teams in every field like top goal scorers, most goals scored, most clean sheets, the achievements of winning cups under a manager in his 1st season etc and yet we have had fuck all said about us?

I literally think that the medias interpretation of their "big four" will NEVER change under ANY circumstances, goes with all the other 16 clubs too an extent imo. No one will never be in the spotlight as much as their 4 darlings...But only do we get the most anti-bias, the most in the league by far.

They managed to ignore the fact that we won the fucking league last season, they were never going to make a fuss about golden boots or gloves

MOTD last week " we didn't have time to include Harts save"
MOTD tonight manage to include wilsheres goal in GOTS
feck em

 

[mancunianpear]

Aguero and Toure would be prem legends if they played elsewhere. I'm not even sure the bias is deliberate, it's just decades of covering certain clubs in a different way.

If they turned out for Chelsea or United they would be lauded as the greatest striker and midfielder in the Premier League era.

 

[pete1970]

Are people talking about me?
Exercising my right to paranoia.

 

[Blue Punter]

Just accept it lads, these fuckers will never give us the credit that we deserve. Really doesn't come as a suprise with the aguero thing at all, how many times has our club outperformed other teams in every field like top goal scorers, most goals scored, most clean sheets, the achievements of winning cups under a manager in his 1st season etc and yet we have had fuck all said about us?

I literally think that the medias interpretation of their "big four" will NEVER change under ANY circumstances, goes with all the other 16 clubs too an extent imo. No one will never be in the spotlight as much as their 4 darlings...But only do we get the most anti-bias, the most in the league by far.

They managed to ignore the fact that we won the fucking league last season, they were never going to make a fuss about golden boots or gloves

MOTD last week " we didn't have time to include Harts save"
MOTD tonight manage to include wilsheres goal in GOTS
feck em

Just another of those "ahem" unfortunate coincidences.