Media bias against City

[Chris in London]

Sterling was £490 million, mate.

Fixed

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Fixed

Is that including his salary?

 

[Chris in London]

Is that including his salary?

No.

Bonuses are extra, too.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

No.

Bonuses are extra, too.

Still better value than Whatsisface.

 

[oakiecokie]

*Removed the picture, forgot the rule*

​

Supposedly positive article, but can't help but think they've turned a cheeky tweet into a little dig.

'So when the £49m star potted a picture on instagram...' - So are we taking it as gospel that Raheem is £49m even though theres no chance those £5m in add ons have been met yet...

Anyway it was a great little tweet from Raheem, feck em.

I`ve also removed mine mate.

 

[MCFC1993]

@oakiecokie you're right completely slipped my mind, you might need to unquote me in that last post so it doesn't show.

EDIT: Beat me to it, cheers pal.

 

[oakiecokie]

@oakiecokie you're right completely slipped my mind, you might need to unquote me in that last post so it doesn't show.

EDIT: Beat me to it, cheers pal.

Easily done,it just takes a bit of getting used to,even though its been a couple of weeks or more.Twats that they are anyway.

 

[aguero93:20]

Fixed

You forgot to convert it to rand, it's 10.3bn.

 

[RichardDunneOwnGoal]

Sterling was £49 million, mate.

Made this point to a rag the other day, but it's no surprise that the rag's scattergun purchase of some unheard of French kid for half a billion yen is never quoted with the add ons included like all our signings are by default.

There's no greater evidence of a media bias than that.

 

[stony]

Still better value than Whatsisface.

To be fair to Whatsisface, he is six foot six and a hundred tons.