Media bias against City

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I notice he doesn't mention Chelsea in that article and I bet he's not printed anything insulting about Abramovich or his money. Presumably he knows what the outcome would be if he did.

No Christmas hamper?

 

[TCIB]

Just seen this belter from The Star:

https://twitter.com/ansbroray

is that the fella ?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

No Christmas hamper?

No kneecaps or even no head.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

Immature, unfunny and bordering on racism.
Just the sort of thing you'd expect in such a rag.

 

[west didsblue]

Sheikh and Vac?
How old is he? 12

 

[HelloCity]

https://twitter.com/ansbroray

is that the fella ?

He's a rag going off his timeline.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Just seen this belter from The Star:

How is that allowed in an national paper? This is the exact reason why we get a bad name.

 

[ohfk]

I know Ray Ansbro(he is a rag), he drinks in my pub from time to time. I know his brother very well and while he also a rag, a nicer guy you couldn't meet. However, that 'article' is appalling and given it's in a national publication it just shows how easy it is to be racist toward anyone from that region and get away with it. I'll give the **** who wrote it both barrels next time I see him.

 

[Segga]

He's on Twitter let him know how you feel

@ansbroray

Going off his timeline he's defo a bitter rag. Retweets pro united stuff and had digs at our empty seats

 

[BlueTG]

What's wrong with our costs and debt being written off by an owner?

They play up hell when owners take out substantial loans against clubs, spend money they don't have and bleed the finances dry from every revenue possible. So United and Liverpool pay their way? How? They don't solely spend their profit revenue on transfer fees and wages do they? Or is it because when they regenerate their stadiums, they're repaid to the owners over 15 years?

Football is a better place with Sheik's and Ambramovic's, fuck the status quo and fuck their revisionist histories and principles