Media bias against City

[Machiavelli]

One who puts a block on people looking at his profile and, ergo, his posts too. Hmmmm.....

My money's on him being Steven Howard. ;-)

You got me ;-)

 

[aguero93:20]

That's so 2015. Now we ask what your previous username was. So what was it?

Banned tosspot I reckon.

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

Banned tosspot I reckon.

Wasn't there a Machiavellian ?

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

Haha

What people must never do is call this man a journalist. He isn't.
A very cursory glance at the Internet finds much disquiet with this charlatan. From dissecting an Arsenal performance in a game he didn't attend, to various other assassinations, this bloke doesn't seem to have a positive bone in his body except, maybe, for Chelsea. I remember reading a book by ex City player Mark Ward, about his time at West Ham. John Lyall invited this 'journalist' to interview Mark and push him for England recognition. Ward mentioned his wife wasn't fully settled yet, as part of the conversation. Needless to say, Ward and Lyall were somewhat perturbed to see Homesick Hammer as the headline the following day. Suffice to say, Lyall rang him and told him never to set foot in Upton Park again.

 

[The perfect fumble]

Haha

I can see it now...

Pep arrives at City....

We draw at Stoke and he's....

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Haha

The concept of a Sun journalist pontificating about people having a grossly inflated idea of his own importance amuses me. Particularly as he's basically told what to write by those that employ him.

 

[manimanc]

One who puts a block on people looking at his profile and, ergo, his posts too. Hmmmm.....

My money's on him being Steven Howard. ;-)

Ha ha that was my first thought as well..
Great minds think alike......;)

 

[dasein]

Haha

:O

 

[Felicity Walsh]

Haha

I'm almost certain that Steven Howard is actually chief sports writer for the S*n and wasn't it he who described our 2-3 Community Shield game in 2011 with the rags as "a victory for good over evil"?

 

[The perfect fumble]

Darren Fletcher and Robbie Savage on 606 tonight were talking about tweets they'd received about the anti City bias in the media, and one tweet in particular that Fletcher had received today.

Fletcher thought it was ridiculous! Preposterous! he dismissed it as unsubstantiated guff, Savage grunted in agreement. Fletcher invited the blue who'd tweeted him to call up to discuss, but left the listeners in no doubt that were he to do so he'd be treated with the ridicule such tinfoil hattery deserved.

There were no takers.