Theres an article in the mirror (not going to quote the link) by Stan Collymore that is beyond laughable..
Gave the Utd treble winner 9.9/10
Gave the Arsenal invincible's 'just short of that'.. though no number given
City treble winners 5/10. (He said us winning the prem was 2 or 3 out of 10 this season)
Haha he evens says Utd and Liverpool spending in the past way more than their rivals at the time has no bearing on his decision...
"I know there’ll be plenty of people saying, ‘But Stan, United have the highest-paid player in the league’, or, ‘Liverpool and United both spent more money than their rivals when they were dominating and nobody said anything about that’.
But Manchester United got to be Manchester United by making very good decisions regularly over a long period of time. The same goes for Liverpool and the other historically big clubs around the world".
So everyone, it's fine for Utd to spend what they had done in the past and get a near perfect score for their treble cos "they made good decisions".
Liverpool spending away.. that's fiiiiiiine.
City winning 1st UK treble? Easy mate we've got money. It's all down to history now obviously.
God hes an odious ****.