Thought the tweets from Winter and Dickinson about Tunnel Club last night were pathetic. It's the same as every Premier League ground, and particularly bad at Wembley, but they never seem to single other clubs out. Seems improbably that it was a purely a coincidence that both tweeted about it around the same time.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,776
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I know that the anthem was booed , but does anybody know if any of the media whores got any shit from our supporters last night ?
They continue to write their shite about the club without any fear of reprisals from the club / owners but the supporters , well I certainly do , get fed up with all the shite and criticism they throw whilst enjoying hospitalityand interviews .
They continue to write their shite about the club without any fear of reprisals from the club / owners but the supporters , well I certainly do , get fed up with all the shite and criticism they throw whilst enjoying hospitalityand interviews .
blueju
Well-Known Member
To be fair they need a good twattingI know that the anthem was booed , but does anybody know if any of the media whores got any shit from our supporters last night ?
They continue to write their shite about the club without any fear of reprisals from the club / owners but the supporters , well I certainly do , get fed up with all the shite and criticism they throw whilst enjoying hospitalityand interviews .
Jordie
Well-Known Member
Can I join the queue?To be fair they need a good twatting
Thought the tweets from Winter and Dickinson about Tunnel Club last night were pathetic. It's the same as every Premier League ground, and particularly bad at Wembley, but they never seem to single other clubs out. Seems improbably that it was a purely a coincidence that both tweeted about it around the same time.
Well they has to make that point with the photo seeing you couldnt see from tv that it was empty! Dont forget its called the tunnel club for a reason people who pay the bug bucks stand there and wait to watch the players come out meaning they wont be in there seats straght away! the times editor must of been on the blower to them for something negative to get the social media into a frenzy so they can get all those clicks!
blueju
Well-Known Member
You can be at the front, I’m thousands of miles away. You can represent me if you wantCan I join the queue?
Jordie
Well-Known Member
With pleasure ;-)You can be at the front, I’m thousands of miles away. You can represent me if you want
Usually ignore the cockroaches but I've responded to that.
One of the replies simply says 'wankpuffin'. That has to be the word of the week. 'Pogba a good player ! Nah, he;s just a wankpuffin'
fixed
I stand corrupted ergh corrected.
No I was right first time.
Seedy Ron
Well-Known Member
I have just bothered to send this to the BBC complaints department and have asked for a reply. Undoubtedly some Rag will be back at me telling me this is not the case and they are fair and balanced.
Every year I pay my BBC television license based on the fact that it is for a publicly funded 'neutral' news, sports and entertainment company. The bitter, biased nature of the company's sports reporting is both clear and consistent, and that is the BBC allows its so called sports reporters to portray Manchester City Football Club in such a negative way it is utterly disgraceful. It is clear most of them have very strong allegiances to other football clubs and seem hellbent on painting Manchester City in a bad light. Year on year Manchester City has been the subject of many negative articles, reports and social media postings by employees of the BBC seemingly without fear of censure or retribution from the 'neutral' company they are employed by. This is without doubt unacceptable and must be addressed by a company who is funded by the public to deliver unbiased reporting and entertainment and not some propaganda machine used to slant the truth and show bias towards a direct competitor of the reporters chosen team. The uneven reporting of Manchester City in relation to some of the other teams competing in the Premier League and high level cup competitions is in a word despicable. It is clear from the manner of most of your articles, reports and tweets that the author has an affiliation with a rival of Manchester City and seems to have the power to distort the truth and facts to suit there own biased agenda without retribution. This must come to an end as it is both unfair and totally against everything the BBC is supposed to stand for. Please address this as a matter of urgency as it has been going on before the company moved to Salford but since then it has got increasingly worse. Just a fair and neutral view of Manchester City football club is all I ask for but for more years than I can remember the BBC has allowed some of it's employees to treat them is anything but.
Feel like I'm pissing into last nights wind but I saw someone had posted a link and felt I should at least try. I await their reply with an already deep sense of disappointment in their findings but thought I'd do it just the same.
Every year I pay my BBC television license based on the fact that it is for a publicly funded 'neutral' news, sports and entertainment company. The bitter, biased nature of the company's sports reporting is both clear and consistent, and that is the BBC allows its so called sports reporters to portray Manchester City Football Club in such a negative way it is utterly disgraceful. It is clear most of them have very strong allegiances to other football clubs and seem hellbent on painting Manchester City in a bad light. Year on year Manchester City has been the subject of many negative articles, reports and social media postings by employees of the BBC seemingly without fear of censure or retribution from the 'neutral' company they are employed by. This is without doubt unacceptable and must be addressed by a company who is funded by the public to deliver unbiased reporting and entertainment and not some propaganda machine used to slant the truth and show bias towards a direct competitor of the reporters chosen team. The uneven reporting of Manchester City in relation to some of the other teams competing in the Premier League and high level cup competitions is in a word despicable. It is clear from the manner of most of your articles, reports and tweets that the author has an affiliation with a rival of Manchester City and seems to have the power to distort the truth and facts to suit there own biased agenda without retribution. This must come to an end as it is both unfair and totally against everything the BBC is supposed to stand for. Please address this as a matter of urgency as it has been going on before the company moved to Salford but since then it has got increasingly worse. Just a fair and neutral view of Manchester City football club is all I ask for but for more years than I can remember the BBC has allowed some of it's employees to treat them is anything but.
Feel like I'm pissing into last nights wind but I saw someone had posted a link and felt I should at least try. I await their reply with an already deep sense of disappointment in their findings but thought I'd do it just the same.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.