Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
Neville knows what he’s doing. He’s taking the piss when he says that’s defo a pen, he knows it’s going to be the story taken from the press & he’s happy not to be balanced which he was when he came into the scene nearly 10 years ago.

He’s a very savvy bloke & he’s learnt that it’s his sound bites still making news 6 months after & he’ll piss himself later. It’s oooooohh noooooo that’s a pen, they’ve got away with it .

Now if that was not genuine why not the same sound bites for them. Fck me when Spurs handballed it could have been awarded a “try” he actually had hold of the ball stopping it moving.

It was very poor from Sky, yes City were nervous but Ederson has made 3 saves in nearly 300 minutes of football, all today & all pretty standard. No mention of Son getting marked out of the game 2nd half, no mention after of Sterling miss, bad tackles & the worst was describing Rosd challenge on Bernardo as the same as Delph on Kane.

The truth doesn’t matter, it’s all about the agenda...... there I’ve fcking said it.
 
Last edited:
Shirley said:
Click to expand...


Excellent point Danny, now are you aware that Phil has 10 starts this season in all competitions of are you demanding 10-15 premier league starts?

As he’s just turned 18 & already has starts & goals in all 4 competitions would it not be good to say he’s possibly already getting more games than you’d expect for someone so young.
 
The MoTD coverage was incredibly biased.

Bernardo was clearly kicked in the area, it was preposterous to suggest "Silva was already going down", the words spoken by Jenas just didn't match what everyone could clearly see in the images.

Additionally, another stonewall penalty shout, the push on Foden in the area on about 52minutes wasn't even shown!

MoTD are a joke!
 
BosnianBlue said:
Buzzer went to Sky once and was biased, they never called him again.
Click to expand...
Don't think he was biased at all. It was the shinny 2-1 derby and he said after the game that there wasn't much in it. This was against the Sky narrative who were in full on granny shagger tug off mode.

He then said he believed it wouldn't be long until we went to the swamp and gave them a good pasting based on what he had witnessed that day and what happened the very next season at the swamp? We fucking scored 6 and Sky's arse fell out.

Sky set the tone and tell people what to believe. Their 'pundits' are made up of gormless zombie ex United and Liverpool players who listen to an ear piece (which probably has to remind them to breath) and when someone goes off narrative you can tell the other pundits are thinking 'holy shit, what do I do now?' because they can't even hide the shock from their dumb arse faces.
 
@BluePhil8 said:
Don't think he was biased at all. It was the shinny 2-1 derby and he said after the game that there wasn't much in it. This was against the Sky narrative who were in full on granny shagger tug off mode.

He then said he believed it wouldn't be long until we went to the swamp and gave them a good pasting based on what he had witnessed that day and what happened the very next season at the swamp? We fucking scored 6 and Sky's arse fell out.

Sky set the tone and tell people what to believe. Their 'pundits' are made up of gormless zombie ex United and Liverpool players who listen to an ear piece (which probably has to remind them to breath) and when someone goes off narrative you can tell the other pundits are thinking 'holy shit, what do I do now?' because they can't even hide the shock from their dumb arse faces.
Click to expand...

He was in the "we" mode and I'd call it biased. And to be honest, if I'd be a PL broadcaster, I wouldn't like a pundit coming on air and saying that stuff. But I wouldn't also do what they are doing now week after week. It's disgraceful really for supposedly neutral broadcaster. It wasn't happening before, they were at least trying to be neutral as much as they were talking shit. Not they just don't give a fuck. they just need to color their studios in red and bring vuvuzelas.
 
BosnianBlue said:
He was in the "we" mode and I'd call it biased. And to be honest, if I'd be a PL broadcaster, I wouldn't like a pundit coming on air and saying that stuff. But I wouldn't also do what they are doing now week after week. It's disgraceful really for supposedly neutral broadcaster. It wasn't happening before, they were at least trying to be neutral as much as they were talking shit. Not they just don't give a fuck. they just need to color their studios in red and bring vuvuzelas.
Click to expand...

No he was the only Blue in a studio with two rags, one of whom was Dwight Yorke, talking absolute bollocks about the game that the rags won a bit fortuitously. He started by asking them if they had watched the same game as him. The argument progressed from there. He was no more blunt and prickly than Souness is as a pundit. He was binned as he didn't fit with the rag love in.
 
paulchapo said:
No he was the only Blue in a studio with two rags, one of whom was Dwight Yorke, talking absolute bollocks about the game that the rags won a bit fortuitously. He started by asking them if they had watched the same game as him. The argument progressed from there. He was no more blunt and prickly than Souness is as a pundit. He was binned as he didn't fit with the rag love in.
Click to expand...

Well, that's exactly what I was trying to say in the first place. He came there once, appeared blue and binned. And yet they are letting this Skylfc.tv going on these days. And Skyrags.tv for years.
 
blueju said:
On sbs over here when they analysed the incident with Bernardo they actually repeated over and over “look, he got the ball first, yeah he got the ball, Bernardo was looking for it” even after numerous sl mo’s when he was clearly kicked . Why does nobody ever pull them up on it?
Click to expand...

I turn off the SBS "analysis". Foster is a grade a ****.
 
BosnianBlue said:
He was in the "we" mode and I'd call it biased. And to be honest, if I'd be a PL broadcaster, I wouldn't like a pundit coming on air and saying that stuff. But I wouldn't also do what they are doing now week after week. It's disgraceful really for supposedly neutral broadcaster. It wasn't happening before, they were at least trying to be neutral as much as they were talking shit. Not they just don't give a fuck. they just need to color their studios in red and bring vuvuzelas.
Click to expand...

Carragher went past ‘we’ mode the other week when they scored last minute against Spurs.
 
blueju said:
On sbs over here when they analysed the incident with Bernardo they actually repeated over and over “look, he got the ball first, yeah he got the ball, Bernardo was looking for it” even after numerous sl mo’s when he was clearly kicked . Why does nobody ever pull them up on it?
Click to expand...
SBS are a joke. Filled with ex-socceroos with a clear Liverpool and Rags agenda. Thank Christ for Optus Sports coverage coming from the UK, a lot better then the SBS dribble
 
Love the supposed fact that we have no margin for error.

1 point in front, +7 gd yet it’s all so easy for Liverpool and it’s us under pressure lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Plain Speaking said:
The MoTD coverage was incredibly biased.

Bernardo was clearly kicked in the area, it was preposterous to suggest "Silva was already going down", the words spoken by Jenas just didn't match what everyone could clearly see in the images.

Additionally, another stonewall penalty shout, the push on Foden in the area on about 52minutes wasn't even shown!

MoTD are a joke!
Click to expand...

He is a fucking tool

“I think Michael Oliver calls it right....it looks a bit clumsy if he’d have given it I don’t think you could argue ...he catches Bernardo Silva first then he gets the ball ...but I don’t think it’s a penalty “

At least Shearer speaking sense about Walkers so called pen
 
Shirley said:
Click to expand...

Danny Mills summing up his own career here "when you're young you try to impress and try too hard.......when you're older you stop doing that"

When Foden has captained City to a Champions League trophy the first question will be "so Phil. Do you feel like you would have had more success if you were playing more regular in the first team when you were 10?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top