squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
It was certainly very long in the reply.Ah I thought the link looked long and copied and pasted to another browser and it worked, I must have logged into companies house there as well at some point
It was certainly very long in the reply.Ah I thought the link looked long and copied and pasted to another browser and it worked, I must have logged into companies house there as well at some point
Who is His Highness?If that was indeed their motivation, then the point I was inexpertly trying to make, is of course redundant at source. Didn’t one of the hacked emails refer to His Highness covering a significant amount of our sponsorship money though? I make no assumption as to whether that info is true or not, but again it’s not hard to see why journalists would link us to the AD government
It could have been me mate. I posted a couple of pages from Google about America, human rights and American owners in our league and said how come the press don't associate their owners with human rights too.So wheres the usual moans and groans from sky bbc and the other media peeps? Who started this shit storm of who owns city. Been back 10 pages wtf, or is it a bring back Swales thread ?
Who is His Highness?
Anyhow our ownership is clearly defined as per the laws of England and Wales in turns of company registration, it’s on public record and anyone can use companies house web check to verify their own curiosity or doubts,It was certainly very long in the reply.
It could have been me mate. I posted a couple of pages from Google about America, human rights and American owners in our league and said how come the press don't associate their owners with human rights too.
It's sort of escalated from there.
I'm just leaving the room quietly..:)
Exactly.Not Sheikh Mansour. According to Prestwich Blue it’s Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nayhan
I agree, but one would have thought these top investigative journalists would be over it like a rash...
I think it was that Don Howe fella. Sorry Don. :)So wheres the usual moans and groans from sky bbc and the other media peeps? Who started this shit storm of who owns city. Been back 10 pages wtf, or is it a bring back Swales thread ?
Ssh don't tell anyone.Ha ha, can you smuggle me out under your coat!
Ah I thought the link looked long and copied and pasted to another browser and it worked, I must have logged into companies house there as well at some point
Twat lolSsh don't tell anyone.
![]()
Do you think anyone will notice ?
Possibly the must simplistic anology I could think of for a simpleton like harris, say if HRH William decides to buy villa his club and they ditch 32 red ad unethical gambling and Windsor castle Ltd take over,if villa got hacked and an email referred to if Windsor castle can’t pay their contractual obligations to villa then hm will cover to save potential brand pr damage, would hm refer to William protecting villa of her majesty protesting the image of Windsor. We as brits know hm would only refer to the queen not William, we as a society do not know naming conventions within the uae and the press have fed bullshit the uneducated masses.Who is His Highness?
Hello BrianNo
I’m Rabin
And so’s my wife
Rabin is an anagram ;-)
If I was on laptop I would have done that, but these fingers aren’t capable of such magic on a phone
Yes, this. In my ham - fisted way, this was point. Well aware we are not owned by a country, and that even if we were "owned" by Abu Dhabi's highest powers that our owner is not sat there dictating policy or starting wars, and that Khaldoon had been handed responsibility to run show anyway. And most importantly, i don't care about journalists any more. But the perception of our owners in wider world of fans rankles and must upset our owners. Am surprised too they have not said more on matter.
Context, seemed shorter to type....Possibly the must simplistic anology I could think of for a simpleton like harris, say if HRH William decides to buy villa his club and they ditch 32 red ad unethical gambling and Windsor castle Ltd take over,if villa got hacked and an email referred to if Windsor castle can’t pay their contractual obligations to villa then hm will cover to save potential brand pr damage, would hm refer to William protecting villa of her majesty protesting the image of Windsor. We as brits know hm would only refer to the queen not William, we as a society do not know naming conventions within the uae and the press have fed bullshit the uneducated masses.
Or more likely someone is having to send them the copy to write as they’re seemingly to thick to work it out for themselves.That's cos they've got eyes like hawks and the sleuthing skills of sherlock holmes for anything negative concerning City.
Turn into blind Pews and Clouseaus when looking at certain others though.
So we are owned by neither a country or a state within that country?