Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
The spotty red shirt adolescents working on the BBC on-line content are now so twisted that you could use any one of them to remove a cork from a bottle. It’s truly pathetic and baffling that the BBC continues to so blatantly support the anti City bias. There is no attempt at any balance which is what they are supposed to be about.

Good on you for the intervention with that quite disgraceful post. Someone’s going to cop a dismissal or legal action when we are exonerated.

Said it before if you want to complain email the head of the bbc not some some ex rag fanzine seller who runs the online sport at the bbc!
 
Maybe the daft fuck can explain why, with Busby's knowledge, the rags gave 16 year old Peter Lorimer's dad a brown envelope containg £5,000 to sign for them. In the early 60s that was 10 times the average annual industrial wage. After he insisted he wanted to join Leeds his dad handed it back. Or when Ryan Giggs signed his mum had her house fully kitted out with white goods. Or when Nicky Butt signed his dad drove out of the swamp in a brand new Mercedes.
Much earlier Busby organised the purchase of a house for Duncan Edward’s parents. This was a sweetener to persuade him to sign for United rather than his local team, Wolves, who he had been associated with previously.
 
Agree.

I think the club does as well, hence why they won't take him to the cleaners.
It's weird. If a person had this level of fixation about another person, they would be deemed obsessive to the point of being dangerous, and might face civil sanctions, restrictions, or restraint. Against an entity though, and it's ok.

Regardless of any personal difficulties he might have been through, I wouldn't be sorry to see City act against him if and when we are cleared. His personal circumstances haven't softened his attitude towards us, and should not be used as an excuse for his vitriolic lies.
 
It's weird. If a person had this level of fixation about another person, they would be deemed obsessive to the point of being dangerous, and might face civil sanctions, restrictions, or restraint. Against an entity though, and it's ok.

Regardless of any personal difficulties he might have been through, I wouldn't be sorry to see City act against him if and when we are cleared. His personal circumstances haven't softened his attitude towards us, and should not be used as an excuse for his vitriolic lies.
"City drive journalist with Mental Health issues to suicide!"
 
The spotty red shirt adolescents working on the BBC on-line content are now so twisted that you could use any one of them to remove a cork from a bottle. It’s truly pathetic and baffling that the BBC continues to so blatantly support the anti City bias. There is no attempt at any balance which is what they are supposed to be about.

Good on you for the intervention with that quite disgraceful post. Someone’s going to cop a dismissal or legal action when we are exonerated.
Well said
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.