OrigamiNinja
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 9,618
It’s not just the trophy haul. The media have done a fantastic job of portraying his time at Liverpool as Pep v Klopp and yet his actual league record says otherwise.The sooner the goofy twat goes the better, not because of any success but the sickly media attention he gets for such an average trophy haul.
Eight years this fella has done at Liverpool. He’s finished 4th or worse in half of those, including winning a title and then needing his keeper to score a header the following season to limp to CL qualification. He finished 5th last season behind such managerial greats at ETH and Eddie Howe and this is the guy the media try to compare to arguably the greatest manager of all time?
Pep is considered a failure if he finishes 2nd and yet Klopp gets an extended holiday every other season. I have no idea why he is running off with his tail between his legs, he has the easiest job in world football. He’s at a club that masquerades as a big club but is actually run like a mid-table PL team that is happy with just avoiding relegation every season. If Klopp had his record at any of the big clubs across Europe, he would have arguably been sacked in 20/21 and he would have 100% been gone last season.
Klopp is a good manager. Theres been loads of them in the English game over the years. I don’t remember any of them getting this amount of credit for one league title, plus a bunch of average/poor seasons. The defence of his one league title is always Citys spending power and yet they never delve into the fact that half the time, there are other clubs between City and Liverpool in the final standings.