Sounds like someone the rags would try and buy from Holland.You reminded me of ‘Meat Van Guy’ selling cheap shit.
Sounds like someone the rags would try and buy from Holland.You reminded me of ‘Meat Van Guy’ selling cheap shit.
I thought so tooThe Sun has nothing to lose over there - so sticking it to ‘em!
everything we do is "outstanding"Well, at least they’re branding the allegations with the colours of the teams behind them.
Of course they will. Before this it wasPoor losers will always find a way to blame someone else for their inadequacy…
I would never give any credit to that bombastic bullfrog.Garth Crooks has obviously been told by some BBC twat to shoehorn a dipper into his team of the season
He seems embarrassed to have to do so and his explanatory paragraph explaining Van Dijk's inclusion is largely spent disparaging their season
Credit where it's due
The BBC online football section has run tens of thousands of hate-filled comments attacking City in recent years. A significant number of them have been racist and libellous but there has been a total lack of editorial control. Perhaps they think it is just banter but it really isn't. Spreading hate (and that's what it is) on a publishing platform can't be justified as a way to spend public money.BBC HYS is a pit of vipers against City. Truly appalling and spiteful for 99% of the posts. Given up replying.
Anti-social media at its worst.
No. It's the same.I saw the back page of the mirror over here earlier on, when I was in the shop on other business, and the back page had the banner headline "UNDISPUTED".Is it different in Blighty?
Yet when City fans question comments they're taken off as not following the rules.The BBC online football section has run tens of thousands of hate-filled comments attacking City in recent years. A significant number of them have been racist and libellous but there has been a total lack of editorial control. Perhaps they think it is just banter but it really isn't. Spreading hate (and that's what it is) on a publishing platform can't be justified as a way to spend public money.