Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
bluealf said:
I presume Heysel was being mentioned in those deleted posts, can't have the truth being spoken.
Click to expand...
100% guaranteed.
Possibly mentioned coach attacks, paving slabs, wanking in public, throwing pensioners into fountains, singing about our deceased monarch, forged tickets and parades on the anniversary of their fans bring responsible for killing 39 innocent people.
I've probably missed a few others.
European Royalty my arse.
 
Blue Feather said:
Bruce has always been decent towards City, take away his red tarnish and he seems like a very decent bloke
Click to expand...
Steve Bruce is a nice guy who can communicate with everyone. Been in his company a few times in my local at the time a few years ago with his son on a Wednesday afternoon and chatted about normal football stuff- always bought the first drink. Been in his company with the wives and still great.

I’m a blue through and through.

You also want to see his house being built off his pay offs - truly magnificent.
 
Mr Fraser said:
Think it was a Mexican who scored 30 odd goals. All I could find for keepers playing as outfield players was Joe Lewis brought as sub for England u21 (managed by guess who?) against Azerbaijan and barthez in a friendly for rags in a friendly against Singapore XI
Click to expand...
Rogerio Ceni, Sao Paulo keeper, scored 131 goals, mostly free kicks and penalties
 
bluemanchester said:
All those column inches won't make him a good goalie as many united fans now think, after less than 10 games, he is not as good as doughnut and actually say he is shite. Keep licking the united brown stuff Barney but know the difference between that and caviar.
Click to expand...
He is only as good as the rubbish in front of him - enough said .
 
Mr Fraser said:
Think it was a Mexican who scored 30 odd goals. All I could find for keepers playing as outfield players was Joe Lewis brought as sub for England u21 (managed by guess who?) against Azerbaijan and barthez in a friendly for rags in a friendly against Singapore XI
Click to expand...
The Mexican keeper who took free kicks was called Jose Luis Chilavert.
 
Blueboy73 said:
100% guaranteed.
Possibly mentioned coach attacks, paving slabs, wanking in public, throwing pensioners into fountains, singing about our deceased monarch, forged tickets and parades on the anniversary of their fans bring responsible for killing 39 innocent people.
I've probably missed a few others.
European Royalty my arse.
Click to expand...
Harold Shipman?
 
blueju said:
Harold Shipman?
Click to expand...
Ahh yes, how could I forget that one?
It's OK to sing about him and glorify the killing of "mancs" but if you refer to them as victims for their refusal to take any responsibility for their numerous well documented misdemeanours, they cry about it and accuse you of "tragedy chanting".
For any lurking Dippers, victims is specifically aimed at Heysel you sanctimonious bin dipping twats.
 
Blueboy73 said:
100% guaranteed.
Possibly mentioned coach attacks, paving slabs, wanking in public, throwing pensioners into fountains, singing about our deceased monarch, forged tickets and parades on the anniversary of their fans bring responsible for killing 39 innocent people.
I've probably missed a few others.
European Royalty my arse.
Click to expand...
They really are a credit to our country.
 
1961_vintage said:
They protect/promote/act according to their commercial interests. What's wrong with that?
Click to expand...
But the BBC is publicly funded , their commercial interest is BBC studios , so you would expect a national public broadcaster to be independent and treat every football club equally , it clearly does not.
If they want to cancel the TV licence and continue as they are by favouring certain football clubs then that's fine , but whilst they are public funded they should be questioned regarding their motives and the reasons for their favouritism.
 
jimmygrimblesboots said:
But the BBC is publicly funded , their commercial interest is BBC studios , so you would expect a national public broadcaster to be independent and treat every football club equally , it clearly does not.
If they want to cancel the TV licence and continue as they are by favouring certain football clubs then that's fine , but whilst they are public funded they should be questioned regarding their motives and the reasons for their favouritism.
Click to expand...
Deserves more than a like. I'm sure there are many decent people employed by the BBC but many there abuse their position and use their roles as a vehicle to push their own biased agenda knowing they can do so with complete impunity.
 
Blueboy73 said:
Deserves more than a like. I'm sure there are many decent people employed by the BBC but many there abuse their position and use their roles as a vehicle to push their own biased agenda knowing they can do so with complete impunity.
Click to expand...

Neville does it on Sky it's a problem in all the press/media
 
give it to gordon said:
Neville does it on Sky it's a problem in all the press/media
Click to expand...
He does but we have the choice as to whether we fund him or not via subscribing to Sly.
Same with the various cockroaches like Harris, Delaney etc.
I have a choice and choose not to buy their products or click on any of their articles.
I choose not to fund them and if everyone else did the same, they would have to reign it in.
You can be prosecuted for not having a TV licence if you watch live TV on any channel even if you don't watch BBC output so unless you choose to break the law, you don't have a choice.
If they weren't funded via a licence fee, it's a different conversation.
That's the point the previous poster made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top