Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not always.

One of the recent "clarifications" that mean the laws are now more than twice the length they used to be since Stanley Rous revamped them in the 30s.
It might be a clarification, but it isn’t a change in the law. It was one of the questions in my ref’s exam thirty years ago!
 
I’m shocked. I honestly am. Sly Sports using Rashford and Manchester United to promote their PL matches. I honestly didn’t expect that. I thought Sly Sports would have used Haaland, the last season’s PL‘s top goal scorer, and Manchester City, the current PL Champions and Treble winners.

39286E6C-B8A8-4AB6-B34E-1631CCCBA493.jpeg
 
I’m shocked. I honestly am. Sly Sports using Rashford and Manchester United to promote their PL matches. I honestly didn’t expect that. I thought Sly Sports would have used Haaland, the last season’s PL‘s top goal scorer, and Manchester City, the current PL Champions and Treble winners.

View attachment 91692
But we're not on TV this week? And the above are
 
It might be a clarification, but it isn’t a change in the law. It was one of the questions in my ref’s exam thirty years ago!
It wasn't in law 11 thirty years ago. I don't think it was put in the law until no more than 20 years ago.
 
Not always.

One of the recent "clarifications" that mean the laws are now more than twice the length they used to be since Stanley Rous revamped them in the 30s.
Dermot Gallagher agreed that Walker was active even though he was off the pitch, a new one on me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.