Pity he didn't backheel the ball as hard as he backheeled the signage boardTbf, I don't know why Kyle led there for so long.
Pity he didn't backheel the ball as hard as he backheeled the signage boardTbf, I don't know why Kyle led there for so long.
It might be a clarification, but it isn’t a change in the law. It was one of the questions in my ref’s exam thirty years ago!Not always.
One of the recent "clarifications" that mean the laws are now more than twice the length they used to be since Stanley Rous revamped them in the 30s.
Extra game ban for his verbal abuse should be in orderVan Dick attacking the match officials seems to have been a figment of my imagination. I wonder if PR guy Dermot will mention it on SSN shortly...?
But we're not on TV this week? And the above areI’m shocked. I honestly am. Sly Sports using Rashford and Manchester United to promote their PL matches. I honestly didn’t expect that. I thought Sly Sports would have used Haaland, the last season’s PL‘s top goal scorer, and Manchester City, the current PL Champions and Treble winners.
View attachment 91692
It wasn't in law 11 thirty years ago. I don't think it was put in the law until no more than 20 years ago.It might be a clarification, but it isn’t a change in the law. It was one of the questions in my ref’s exam thirty years ago!
Dermot Gallagher agreed that Walker was active even though he was off the pitch, a new one on me.Not always.
One of the recent "clarifications" that mean the laws are now more than twice the length they used to be since Stanley Rous revamped them in the 30s.
Dermot Gallagher agreed that Walker was active even though he was off the pitch, a new one on me.