Talksport caught lying again, they have just claimed Akanji was in the line of sight in an attempt to degrade City`s result. the problem with this theory is mathematics, if Akanji was in the line of sight, and he did get out of the way of the ball, as he did, then the ball would have hit the goalkeeper, it did not the goalkeeper had to dive to the opposite side of the net from the header. Talksport and a few others outright lying.
Talk sport and so many other pundits have got this decision all wrong.
Firstly, I’m old school and it should be offside.
Then they changed the rules. So it onside.
The keeper could see the ball as clearly as I could.
Ake had the full goal to aim at.
The question was. Which side was he going to put it?
It took an age for the ball to sit nicely for Ake. So much so, that he leaned back and put everything through the header.
Once the keeper realised where it was going. He dived.
Best thing the keeper could hope for, would have been contact with Akanji.
Because there was no way he was getting anywhere near it.
Webb said it was a mistake to allow the goal.
Than when pressed. He said only under these set of circumstances.
Which means that it will never be resolved.
Unlike back in the day when it was given as offside.
I also blame Akanji for being lazy. Lol