Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
The lies are that without fail, every single time Aluko says something that annoys people, we have multiple posters on here trotting out the tale about the time she made some spurious claim of racism that got the England manager the sack.

We can speculate whether the Bristol story would likely have ever come to light without the racism stuff putting him in the spotlight. But I don’t see there’s too much to be gained by repeatedly going over that every time.

I think you’ll find that’s he narrative. It’s like if you ask if City only got off at CAS due to time barring.

Facts are forgotten far quicker than the narrative.
 
Yes we don’t but do you think this Bristol stuff would have come out if it wasn’t for the intense media speculation supporting Eni Aluko’s case.

I haven’t read all the thread so I don’t know what the lies are you are going on about. It was probably Sampson’s time to go and he had enough on his charge sheet. That said, anyone whose ever been in a tribunal or similar legal set up would have loved the incredible media support that Aluko got.

This is incredible that you're shifting the focus.

You're not bothered that he was in a position of influence and shagging a player under his coaching, you're bothered how that came to light!!

That's wild.
 
This is incredible that you're shifting the focus.

You're not bothered that he was in a position of influence and shagging a player under his coaching, you're bothered how that came to light!!

That's wild.
Not your boring shite ffs. I’ve said they probably had enough on the charge sheet to sack Sampson anyway. This is the “Media Discussion” thread so I’m well within my rights to highlight how orchestrated the media campaign against Sampson appeared.
 
Not your boring shite ffs. I’ve said they probably had enough on the charge sheet to sack Sampson anyway. This is the “Media Discussion” thread so I’m well within my rights to highlight how orchestrated the media campaign against Sampson appeared.

When you're caught out being a numpty and don't address it, it's "boring", but you're good to defend a 'groomer'.

Cool. At least I know where you're at.
 
I think you’ll find that’s he narrative. It’s like if you ask if City only got off at CAS due to time barring.

Facts are forgotten far quicker than the narrative.

Same as everyone still thinks poor old Len Fairclough got done for noncing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.