Which is, basically, their job.It's a very confusing and poor article and either demonstrates that they don't really know what they're talking about or, if they do, they haven't communicated it very well.
Which is, basically, their job.It's a very confusing and poor article and either demonstrates that they don't really know what they're talking about or, if they do, they haven't communicated it very well.
Let’s face it mate, it’s par for the course these days!If one of the red shirt clubs were possibly winning four in a row the media would be completely behind them. No other club has been attacked by them the way City have for the temerity of being better than anyone else and you have to be pathetic human being to hate a great team and players for political reasons rather than sporting.
Fuck em.If one of the red shirt clubs were possibly winning four in a row the media would be completely behind them. No other club has been attacked by them the way City have for the temerity of being better than anyone else and you have to be pathetic human being to hate a great team and players for political reasons rather than sporting.
Yes, that how the calculation of net spend worksAccording to Simon "Freeloader" Stone that net spend doesn't count,
"A substantial factor in bringing their figure down to £259m has been their ability to sell players such as Gabriel Jesus, Oleksandr Zinchenko, Riyad Mahrez, Aymeric Laporte and Cole Palmer for huge sums.