Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
They have some stupid made up fact check label on some of their news reports too, maybe if they had it back in the late 70's and 80's when Saville was ploughing his way through the organisation we would be in a better place :)
BBC Verify - Marianna Spring is their fact checker in chief - the woman that lied on her CV to get the job.
 
BBC Verify - Marianna Spring is their fact checker in chief - the woman that lied on her CV to get the job.
BBC Verify....I watched Ross Atkins do a couple of pieces on politics prior to Verify setting up and he was I felt really good.

Verify starts and he does something on us, pile of crap full of untruths. I was hoping he'd be on the ball but, like the rest of them, only when it suits.
 
I think the BBC gossip page is more of a 'wish list' for their red-shirted readers.

BBC - "Misinformation is dangerous"
Also BBC - "Here is your daily ration of gossip"
The BBC gossip page is written by one of the Brontes but with Angela Rayner's grammar inserted to make it look authentic.
 
BBC Verify - Marianna Spring is their fact checker in chief - the woman that lied on her CV to get the job.
Whilst not doubting you :-)
I thought I'd best check.

She lied on her CV for a job application but when caught she said 'but everything else is true'.

The laugh is, she lied about working for the bbc who she now works for ....checking for lies.
 
Whilst not doubting you :-)
I thought I'd best check.

She lied on her CV for a job application but when caught she said 'but everything else is true'.

The laugh is, she lied about working for the bbc who she now works for ....checking for lies.


She's made quite the career for a lying fucker telling other lying fuckers to stop lying, she even wrote a book about it.
 
BBC Verify....I watched Ross Atkins do a couple of pieces on politics prior to Verify setting up and he was I felt really good.

Verify starts and he does something on us, pile of crap full of untruths. I was hoping he'd be on the ball but, like the rest of them, only when it suits.
The BBC went into lock-step with other international news agencies to decide which stories they deem are true and which they deem aren't
 
They just couldn’t help themselves.


More mindless rubbish to undermine City and promote controversy where none exists.

UEFA convention records the final score for coefficients so the result for City v Real Madrid was a draw - both on the day and over the two legs. Someone has to go through in a knockout competition and in this case it was on penalties. Previously decisions have been made on away goals, the toss of a coin or currently on penalties. It maybe pedantic but you can lose the tie and win or draw the game

Had City played at the Etihad first and lost on penalties away at the Bernabau would they still claim City had lost at home so the record could not stand? As City fans we have come to expect this level of puerile pettiness from our detractors who cannot accept our success.
 
Moving the goalposts after the event to try and hamper City. Sounds familiar…
Those are the competition rules they signed up to. If they hate them so much perhaps they should fuck off and play in another competition whose rules are more to their liking.

That's how these things work isn't it?
 
More mindless rubbish to undermine City and promote controversy where none exists.

UEFA convention records the final score for coefficients so the result for City v Real Madrid was a draw - both on the day and over the two legs. Someone has to go through in a knockout competition and in this case it was on penalties. Previously decisions have been made on away goals, the toss of a coin or currently on penalties. It maybe pedantic but you can lose the tie and win or draw the game

Had City played at the Etihad first and lost on penalties away at the Bernabau would they still claim City had lost at home so the record could not stand? As City fans we have come to expect this level of puerile pettiness from our detractors who cannot accept our success.
We’d have won on away goals under the old rules which applied to the rags too
 
Perhaps post comments on his articles he writes in the MEN letting him know what a rag tool he is…
I called him ragiowski on the Muen..said he was a rag and shouldn't be allowed to report on City..but surprisingly the MUen took down the comments..he's a fucking bigmouthed rag **** that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near our club
 
More mindless rubbish to undermine City and promote controversy where none exists.

UEFA convention records the final score for coefficients so the result for City v Real Madrid was a draw - both on the day and over the two legs. Someone has to go through in a knockout competition and in this case it was on penalties. Previously decisions have been made on away goals, the toss of a coin or currently on penalties. It maybe pedantic but you can lose the tie and win or draw the game

Had City played at the Etihad first and lost on penalties away at the Bernabau would they still claim City had lost at home so the record could not stand? As City fans we have come to expect this level of puerile pettiness from our detractors who cannot accept our success.
Correct, we keep being up there with the best and the media have to pander to the also rans for their needy clicks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top