Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rashford article by Sly Stone on BBC United - Mediacity, Football.

The big nosed rag, ****, couldn’t help himself.

Part of the article. No link.

Who could afford Rashford?​

Rashford is one of United's highest earners, with a basic wage in excess of £300,000 a week. Only a small number of clubs can afford that salary and, for a variety of reasons, some of them are not in the market.

In Spain, Barcelona's financial issues are well known. Real Madrid are already struggling to find the right attacking combination from Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Jr and Jude Bellingham.

Atletico paid huge money to Manchester City for Julian Alvarez just before the summer transfer deadline.

Of England's top clubs, Manchester City and Liverpool seem a bit of a stretch, even with City in such poor form.
The trouble is that if you buy him then he's already got a new contract so he doesn't even have to try for three and a half years, for the money you'd spend versus the return you'd get he's a 2 out of 10 at best in the transfer market - there's far more value to be had out there.
 
They are a public broadcasting operation. They shouldn't need to look for clicks in this country.

I'm trying to find the article from around 15 years ago where it was revealed the scum has met with BBC Sport to discuss an 'arrangement' and we're publicly told to fuck off. Privately the editorial decisions seem the opposite. Do BBc Sport have a rag in charge of them like the News has a Tory?
From my experience regardless of their political leaning people are convinced the BBC is against the party they personally favour!
 
Rashford article by Sly Stone on BBC United - Mediacity, Football.

The big nosed rag, ****, couldn’t help himself.

Part of the article. No link.

Who could afford Rashford?​

Rashford is one of United's highest earners, with a basic wage in excess of £300,000 a week. Only a small number of clubs can afford that salary and, for a variety of reasons, some of them are not in the market.

In Spain, Barcelona's financial issues are well known. Real Madrid are already struggling to find the right attacking combination from Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Jr and Jude Bellingham.

Atletico paid huge money to Manchester City for Julian Alvarez just before the summer transfer deadline.

Of England's top clubs, Manchester City and Liverpool seem a bit of a stretch, even with City in such poor form.

So the real story is they’ve got a 27 year old player that no one wants with 3 1/2 years of £300k per week or £54.6m in contracted wages due which he could pick up training with the kids.

When you consider the Sancho loan they should know they don’t hold the cards.
 
Rashford article by Sly Stone on BBC United - Mediacity, Football.

The big nosed rag, ****, couldn’t help himself.

Part of the article. No link.

Who could afford Rashford?​

Rashford is one of United's highest earners, with a basic wage in excess of £300,000 a week. Only a small number of clubs can afford that salary and, for a variety of reasons, some of them are not in the market.

In Spain, Barcelona's financial issues are well known. Real Madrid are already struggling to find the right attacking combination from Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Jr and Jude Bellingham.

Atletico paid huge money to Manchester City for Julian Alvarez just before the summer transfer deadline.

Of England's top clubs, Manchester City and Liverpool seem a bit of a stretch, even with City in such poor form.
Sorry but this **** needs a fucking good hiding, ugly bastard.
 
So the real story is they’ve got a 27 year old player that no one wants with 3 1/2 years of £300k per week or £54.6m in contracted wages due which he could pick up training with the kids.

When you consider the Sancho loan they should know they don’t hold the cards.
Yeah he will end up at Everton or Villa on a subsidised loan, then from summer a loan with obligation to buy. No one buys him and pays full wages.
 
Yeah he will end up at Everton or Villa on a subsidised loan, then from summer a loan with obligation to buy. No one buys him and pays full wages.

Why would anyone pay money for him? His stock is low & he’s not worth £300k per week. If another club was willing to pay him £100k per week then he’d be short by £36m over the term of his contract. Either the buying club would make that up in wages or the Rags would have to pay him up but he ain’t giving up £36m.
 
Why would anyone pay money for him? His stock is low & he’s not worth £300k per week. If another club was willing to pay him £100k per week then he’d be short by £36m over the term of his contract. Either the buying club would make that up in wages or the Rags would have to pay him up but he ain’t giving up £36m.
Like when we signed Fowler, it could be similar. He wouldn't get paid up, they just carry on paying the difference for the length of the previous contract then wages fall.
 
Who cares about money? We shouldnt. Its so off the scale per day even we cant fathom it as normal working people. Arguing about who is worth 200 or 300k a month. Our bosses are probably on somewhere in the £50-£100k a year bracket. Its all a joke. The goalkeeper for Swansea City is probably on £20k a month and name him if you can
 
Like when we signed Fowler, it could be similar. He wouldn't get paid up, they just carry on paying the difference for the length of the previous contract then wages fall.

I would imagine whoever is representing him would say if he stays he earns £54m & it costs them that even if he doesn’t play. Surely he deserves a percentage of that to leave.
 
So the real story is they’ve got a 27 year old player that no one wants with 3 1/2 years of £300k per week or £54.6m in contracted wages due which he could pick up training with the kids.

When you consider the Sancho loan they should know they don’t hold the cards.
Don't worry ssn pr will pick price wages and more importantly club
Do anything to help rags
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top