As I found out (see Gonzalez thread) libellous comments are apparently fine as they don't breach the 'house rules' as they are deemed 'personal opinions' and therefore bbc are apparently not liable for publishing them(!) Go figure...
The BBC threads are poison. I have been silenced for responding numerous times. I no longer read them. Its rag central.
Clear and obvious
Dirty bastards.
Not disputing any of the above or suggesting this makes the situation any better but just for some context. The BBC moderators are just a bunch of Gen Z dick heads that sit around one desk with their heads stuck in their phones all day on "Insta". They don't have a particular interest in football and certainly would have no idea what #115 meant. They moderate other areas that they have equally no interest or knowledge of. They moderate (poorly often) from a set of guide lines.
I heard he became a detective and did OK for himself in his second chapter!
That sounds like the BBC is creating their own liability by giving moderation short shrift.
Fans of other clubs clubs are equally sure it's clear & obvious fans are being treated snidely. Both Tory and Labour voters are equally sure the bias is against the party of their choice.
Yes, but the fans of other clubs, Labour and Conservative voters (or indeed anybody engaging in voting imagining it matters), people on Facebook, BBC employees and anybody who watches the BBC are all wrong and stupid.
I haven't got my head in the sand and I haven't given an excuse. I haven't said if it's right or wrong just reporting facts.
Not my wife but the BBC is full of people who can't do the job, it's essentially public sector-it's awash with wasters stealing a living. Have you have dealt with a single person at the council/civil service that you remotely felt were able to do a good job?
I have worked in both the Civil Service and at the Council, similar to a few others on here. TBH there's a highly unoriginal clown like you everywhere you go, having a pop without really having a clue.
