Media discussion - 2024/25

What is twatterface's problem with City? He was cheering when he thought City's last minute goal at Wolves was ruled out, dickhead. Last night his commentary at the swamp was so fawning it was nauseous.
Unfortunately for him, he will only ever be remembered for one thing .... well two, actually.
 
How did you come to that conclusion when the amendment states the below

"A state-controlled club is one which is wholly or majority-owned by individual(s), entities, or entities controlled by individual(s) who are deemed by the IFR or the secretary of state to be under the influence of any state actor, including but not limited to: members of any government or their immediate family, a head of state or their immediate family, diplomats, lobbyists, or other state representatives, or their immediate family, and sovereign wealth funds."

I know what the proposed amendment says. I posted it first.

But the bill as discussed in the Lords didn't have this amendment in it and so far it hasn't even been discussed as an amendment.

So to say the bill includes that definition, as you did, is wrong. It may eventually, but it probably won't.
 
What is twatterface's problem with City? He was cheering when he thought City's last minute goal at Wolves was ruled out, dickhead. Last night his commentary at the swamp was so fawning it was nauseous.
he was rejected for city square presenters job by the other knob the Southampton fan who's name escapes me ( Hugh Ferris )
 
Last edited:
I know what the proposed amendment says. I posted it first.

But the bill as discussed in the Lords didn't have this amendment in it and so far it hasn't even been discussed as an amendment.

So to say the bill includes that definition, as you did, is wrong. It may eventually, but it probably won't.
Especially when Mansour calls Starmer to remind him who bailed Barclays out and any future investment in the country could be in jeopardy.
 
It seems to me that if you describe yourself as a journalist you're then issued with a immunity pass when it comes to writing lies, misinformation and thinly veiled racist comments.
Thing is, he more or less implies we recently invented parades and statues to glorify AD. Over a million people turned out in Manchester over 100 years ago to see City parade the FA Cup, not all were City fans but wanted to see the actual trophy in the flesh, so to speak. And just because Utd fans can't be bothered travelling up from London mid week, doesn't mean we shouldn't. Also .... statues ... that's just a ridiculous statement.
And as for celebrating Rods Balon D'or, it's the first time in a long time that a player representing the so called best league in the world has picked up the award (let alone all the other justifications ). If he doesn't appreciate the significance of that, then football isn't for him, but then we knew that a few years ago.
 
What is twatterface's problem with City? He was cheering when he thought City's last minute goal at Wolves was ruled out, dickhead. Last night his commentary at the swamp was so fawning it was nauseous.

Apart from being a knobhead and loser( Natalie says hi ), he is just a shill / media whore who relies upon attacks on City for his upkeep ( the word earnings deliberately avoided )
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.