had a couple of rows on X with him, now I've gone private and I can call him a **** without him seeing, pleases me no end tbh :)I don't like that twat.
had a couple of rows on X with him, now I've gone private and I can call him a **** without him seeing, pleases me no end tbh :)I don't like that twat.
Hugh Mcilvanney fucking hated City. He can fuck off too.Your final line sums it up for so many of us.. and not just the MEN but the whole, rancid mess that makes up the UK football press and media.
I grew up reading the likes of national sports/football observers such as Neville Cardus, Hugh McIlvanney and Michael Parkinson, together with local writers of the calibre of Eric Todd, Peter Gardner and (yes!) David Meek.
All of them were journalists above everything else and they were (mostly) objective in how they brought match reports and other related sports/football stories to their readers.
Today's childish scribblers, with the odd exception such as Martin Samuel, are light-years behind those named above when it comes to journalistic talent and integrity.
SbiacBajkowski is a rag, he admitted it on one of his podcasts.
The interview Bajkowski gave on Talksport yesterday was truly bizarre.
Basically only spoke about 115, City getting relegated and Pep wanting to fuck off.
Not the first time he’s been on Talksport with snide City comments either.
Who on earth does he think will buy his book when he goes on national radio with what seems the sole intention of pissing off blues.
Bizarre
They just couldn’t help themselves.
We lost the tie. We didn’t lose any games. Are they fucking thick?New York times is in bed with FSG hence the saltiness.