Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
He obviously isn't a true fan. The bid for Chelsea is proof.
Just sees it as a vehicle to earn money and raise his profile. Although a lot of (failed) owners use it as a vanity project.
Think Dave Brailsford being the "footballing guru" reminds me of Sir Clive Woodward becoming Southampton's saviour.
Let's hope this turns out as well...
It strikes me that all the penny pinching and trimming of peripheral costs plus trying to blag public funds for a new stadium is typical venture capitalist behaviour. Trying to make the asset leaner and the books look better prior to a sale.
 
The BBC using weird language in the reporting of uniteds offside goal last night.

'Maguire headed the winner, despite appearing to be offside when Bruno Fernandes.'

'It was down to the decision of the officials, who felt there was nothing wrong with the goal.'

'Having had time to analyse replays of the goal, VAR would most likely have overturned the on-pitch decision.'

Is there any reason they can't say it was offside when it was offside and there is no doubt it was offside because it was offside?
 
Article on BBC Sport about Pep's comments on the charges.

Pep talks about the fact our net spend remains low even after January spend. Says we have spent a lot less than the top 6.

Rather than present information in order of highest to lowest spend, because that would help prove Pep's points, they do it in alphabetical order. I'm pretty certain if we were top spenders they would have ordered it with us in bold right at the top.

Vermin
 
The BBC using weird language in the reporting of uniteds offside goal last night.

'Maguire headed the winner, despite appearing to be offside when Bruno Fernandes.'

'It was down to the decision of the officials, who felt there was nothing wrong with the goal.'

'Having had time to analyse replays of the goal, VAR would most likely have overturned the on-pitch decision.'

Is there any reason they can't say it was offside when it was offside and there is no doubt it was offside because it was offside?
There's no way that linesman from his position should be missing that, as ever at that shithole it does suggest conspiracy theories. It's not the first and won't be the last,for those who hate VAR and I'm one of them,this is how the pisscan marched unchallenged to his 13 Premier League's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top