Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a complete boys club. Worst part is no one really likes any of the Sky or TNT pundits. Neville and Carragher are nauseating.

Ferdinand, Hargreaves and Scholes are even worse and incredibly boring. Even most rags don't like them. Yet we have to put up with them week in week out.
 
give it to gordon said:
To be honest I don't need someone telling me what I saw ;)
I watch the game I don't need some has been ex drug cheat telling me his views. I couldn't give a shit about their views.

The simple fact is City are in the next round dippers aren't.
Click to expand...
Has the hell-hole end of the East Lancs come to terms with this little known fact.
 
AirbagsOptionalTheReturn said:
The coverage of the Plymouth result and the language used by the bbc is totally different to the coverage we get. If we got beat by a team that had won one game in 3 months, after making a few changes to the line up, the tone would have been that we disrespected the cup and that we should be ashamed, where as the dippers get “Slot has made a mistake but it’s understandable due to other priorities”. I wish I could elect to not pay part of the license fee - the football part - as that department is not fit for purpose
Click to expand...
Might be not too far away.
 
IMG_1025.jpeg

I did reply and point out that last season we beat Spurs, Newcastle and Chelsea on the way to the final, and the year before we beat Chelsea and Arsenal before beating United in the final (on the way to a treble), so this easy draws narrative is a load of rubbish.

Won’t print that though will they, c*nts.
 
Charlesfarsbar said:
Everything this guy puts into print about us has some kind of snide innuendo attached

Even in the press conference he asks questions that are trying to find an angle that’s not there

We need to start making it uncomfortable for these wankers when they are at the game, it’s the only way we can fight back against their constant slandering of the club
Click to expand...
It's time we told 'em to fuck off and not come back until they had adopted an objective style rather than the usual snidey, rag-infused, BBC-tailored shite.
 
smevchenko said:
View attachment 146324

I did reply and point out that last season we beat Spurs, Newcastle and Chelsea on the way to the final, and the year before we beat Chelsea and Arsenal before beating United in the final (on the way to a treble), so this easy draws narrative is a load of rubbish.

Won’t print that though will they, c*nts.
Click to expand...
Just remind me who the dippers got in the last round.
Oh yeah Plymouth.... a very Bad draw in the cup for them
 
HelloCity said:
View attachment 146262
Click to expand...
Telling, and somewhat disrespectful, that not a single one of those is an Everton top despite neither team being in the CL. And despite the artist going to the trouble of producing United shirts with at least three different sponsors and thus spanning around a decade.

Also worth noting that Rooney is a fat, granny shagging ****.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Telling, and somewhat disrespectful, that not a single one of those is an Everton top despite neither team being in the CL. And despite the artist going to the trouble of producing United shirts with at least three different sponsors and thus spanning around a decade.

Also worth noting that Rooney is a fat, granny shagging ****.
Click to expand...
A fat granny shagging **** who also has an appalling record as a manager of football clubs. Why the fuck should anybody listen to a single word he says?
 
He’stheleftbackremember said:
Rachel Burden and Rick Edwards on BBC 5 live this morning bemused why there are still tickets for sale for the Madrid game, then later saying oh they are sold out. WTF has this got to do with a national news broadcaster. I genuinely hate the BBC more then any other media outlet.
Click to expand...
Meanwhile sky offer totally fair and non red club biased shite?

Their sports pages are unashamedly written for those clubs. Sky's links and ties to those clubs, their profits tied together with how well those clubs perform. So much so that those clubs get their presenters, we all have to watch carragher and neville, fuck the other clubs, fuck the PL champions.

At least the bbc attempt to be impartial and I don't like their coverage, but it is ten times fairer than sky United.
 
It's a strange one, isn't it. Historically, their leanings towards the red top clubs is understandable ( to a certain extent) based on who won competitions in the past and the lack of interest from across the pond. But given the viewing figures for the last few years globally, not just in the US, you would have thought that a different strategy would be screaming at them, and that would be, to carry on flying on the coat tails of winners and the most watched team.

Their viewing figures are telling them one thing and they are doing the opposite. Whilst they control the TV coverage atm, they can afford to, but they are damaging their negotiating position going forward for international tv rights, by not giving over the top coverage, to the team a lot of people outside the UK want to see more content about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top