Media discussion - 2025/26

IrishBloodEnglishHeart said:
I remember him tweeting he was kicked out. That came from him.

Click to expand...

Well found. More evidence for the prosecution - he's getting closer to a berth on my chart ;-)
SWP's back said:
Are you kidding? It’s in most articles explaining behind the scenes goings on for all clubs. If you’re not aware why they put it in then what hole have you been living in these last 80 odd years.
Click to expand...
One considerably more congenial than the void between your ears. One of these days you might stumble upon something relevant or true to say about subjects of which you are pig ignorant but I doubt it.
 
johnny crossan said:
Do you bother to read the thread you're commenting on? To repeat - it's a dipper puff piece,
Click to expand...
I do and indeed did. Just because in your twisted world that reads as a dipper puff piece doesn't actually make it so. That collection of pictures of journalists you don't like is a bit weird as well, even more so if you assembled it yourself.


By the way, it took me seconds to find the archived version.
 
johnny crossan said:
I almost wish I had a sub just to extract a few of his comments about us over the years - you have to work hard to get in my Hall of Infamy - he's still knocking on the door ;-)

View attachment 162457
Click to expand...
That is an utter infestation of uber cunts, recidivists and deviants, admire your single minded obsession Johnny. ;-)
 
Centurions said:
I do and indeed did. Just because in your twisted world that reads as a dipper puff piece doesn't actually make it so. That collection of pictures of journalists you don't like is a bit weird as well, even more so if you assembled it yourself.


By the way, it took me seconds to find the archived version.
Click to expand...
But hours to post it lol - the montage is all my own work so I wear the 'weird' badge with pride - I have another of dodgy BM posters btw but you've not been around long enough to qualify for an appearance yet ;-)
 
johnny crossan said:
I'm afraid the jury came in with their guilty verdict on Sam long ago.
Click to expand...

I think that is the crux. It takes a long time to mend burned bridges.

Three things come to mind immediately.

The championing of the WhatsApp group as arbiters on all that is wrong with the club, including participation in a portion of a MacKenna podcast subtitled "Bad moon rising? Manchester City are in a whole host of blinding headlights. To break down the flaws and failures, the ethics and the crimes, from the court rooms to the board rooms".

Then there was his Twitter survey of "City fans" looking for views on the fans' relationship with the owner, led by this tweet "Are there any City fans reading this who feel sandwiched between 'City are corrupt and evil' and 'my club never do any wrong, everybody is out to get us'?" The result was predictable. And useless.

And, finally, the crowning turd in the water tank, his suggestion that City fans never warmed to Riyadh Mahrez because "Perhaps his race and faith play into that — maybe those Haaland clips are easier to relate to because he is a white European rather than a North African Muslim. Of course, that will not be a factor for many, but it cannot be overlooked as one reason why he has maybe not been given the love that a player with his contributions would ordinarily receive and deserve."

That was me done with him.

The ****.
 
halfcenturyup said:
I think that is the crux. It takes a long time to mend burned bridges.

Three things come to mind immediately.

The championing of the WhatsApp group as arbiters on all that is wrong with the club, including participation in a portion of a MacKenna podcast subtitled "Bad moon rising? Manchester City are in a whole host of blinding headlights. To break down the flaws and failures, the ethics and the crimes, from the court rooms to the board rooms".

Then there was his Twitter survey of "City fans" looking for views on the fans' relationship with the owner, led by this tweet "Are there any City fans reading this who feel sandwiched between 'City are corrupt and evil' and 'my club never do any wrong, everybody is out to get us'?" The result was predictable. And useless.

And, finally, the crowning turd in the water tank, his suggestion that City fans never warmed to Riyadh Mahrez because "Perhaps his race and faith play into that — maybe those Haaland clips are easier to relate to because he is a white European rather than a North African Muslim. Of course, that will not be a factor for many, but it cannot be overlooked as one reason why he has maybe not been given the love that a player with his contributions would ordinarily receive and deserve."

That was me done with him.

The ****.
Click to expand...
A grisly reminder of some of that odious rag cockroach's anti-City smearings over the years which no doubt will produce more pavlovian quiverings of protest from his long standing superfans on here - including those saddos sitting under distant palm trees working so hard on improving their obnoxious ratings.
 
vomit said:
This is where the BBC staff come to laugh at us because of what they do and don't post in their football section of the website.
Click to expand...
Loving your work....need to work on the xG though :-)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-07-10 141210.png
    Screenshot 2025-07-10 141210.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 71
johnny crossan said:
I almost wish I had a sub just to extract a few of his comments about us over the years - you have to work hard to get in my Hall of Infamy - he's still knocking on the door ;-)

View attachment 162457
Click to expand...
When you look at that shower, it is difficult to pick the worst. A truly obnoxious pile of shite.
 
halfcenturyup said:
I think that is the crux. It takes a long time to mend burned bridges.

Three things come to mind immediately.

The championing of the WhatsApp group as arbiters on all that is wrong with the club, including participation in a portion of a MacKenna podcast subtitled "Bad moon rising? Manchester City are in a whole host of blinding headlights. To break down the flaws and failures, the ethics and the crimes, from the court rooms to the board rooms".

Then there was his Twitter survey of "City fans" looking for views on the fans' relationship with the owner, led by this tweet "Are there any City fans reading this who feel sandwiched between 'City are corrupt and evil' and 'my club never do any wrong, everybody is out to get us'?" The result was predictable. And useless.

And, finally, the crowning turd in the water tank, his suggestion that City fans never warmed to Riyadh Mahrez because "Perhaps his race and faith play into that — maybe those Haaland clips are easier to relate to because he is a white European rather than a North African Muslim. Of course, that will not be a factor for many, but it cannot be overlooked as one reason why he has maybe not been given the love that a player with his contributions would ordinarily receive and deserve."

That was me done with him.

The ****.
Click to expand...
Fucking bob on.
 
johnny crossan said:
One considerably more congenial than the void between your ears. One of these days you might stumble upon something relevant or true to say about subjects of which you are pig ignorant but I doubt it.
Click to expand...
Oh jog on you soft old fruit. You’re offended by everyone and afraid of everything. You’re a walking trope for Fanny wipes.
 
citizen_maine said:
So, no mention of the universe then huh? This is almost Sam Lee esque ridiculing of our club. You should be banned!










:-)
Click to expand...
You’re just trying to get me in trouble with @jimharri and the Mods!!!

I might just get away with caps for that length of message but I’d probably get banned for any longer one!!! ;-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top