Media discussion - 2025/26

The elephant is the room is that some of these pundits hate City, and have always hated City, because of the ethnicity of our owner. It is essentially racist and comes from a very bad place. The whole concept of sportswashing is based on a racist ideology that our owner can’t invest his wealth for profit like anyone else. The sub narrative is: “You can’t trust Arabs and they are all the same.” Delaney in particular has visceral hatred towards our club. It needs calling out for what it is.

In Delaney's case, Newcastle was equally targeted in almost the same terms and the same sneers and slurs. He got into some online exchanges with them too, and it got quite toxic. I have a recollection that it became pretty clear that he was instructed to dial it back by his bosses.

As you say, it's not difficult to think of something City and Newcastle have in common.
 
It really is a beautiful thing to watch. The precise definition of Schadenfreude played out in public for us blues. He was so close to bursting into tears, while the other three guys watched with rising amusement. As he got more and more desperate and ridiculous, the others giggled more and more, before breaking into uncontrolled laughter.

I highly recommend every one of you watch in minute detail one of our biggest detractors - Barney Ronay, the self-crowned erudite intellectual king of football journalism (but actually a florid and grandiloquent twat) - having a depressive breakdown live on air, from 1m10s in...


I zipped to 1:10 … and got as far as ‘…Haaland is paid a great deal more’ before I had to stop.
Ronay has a great voice for newsprint…
 
In Delaney's case, Newcastle was equally targeted in almost the same terms and the same sneers and slurs. He got into some online exchanges with them too, and it got quite toxic. I have a recollection that it became pretty clear that he was instructed to dial it back by his bosses.

As you say, it's not difficult to think of something City and Newcastle have in common.
I’ve directly argued with Delaney before, when you challenge him he has little to no substance behind his arguments. I pressed him on “Sports Washing” and why buying a sports club in the most toxically partisan sport in the world, is a good way to improve your reputation, especially when said club will be challenging the established elite of the sport and ruffling feathers just by improving.

He had no real response and ended up just not responding when I pressed him. They do this all the time, leave cheap remarks and then have nothing behind it.
 
It really is a beautiful thing to watch. The precise definition of Schadenfreude played out in public for us blues. He was so close to bursting into tears, while the other three guys watched with rising amusement. As he got more and more desperate and ridiculous, the others giggled more and more, before breaking into uncontrolled laughter.

I highly recommend every one of you watch in minute detail one of our biggest detractors - Barney Ronay, the self-crowned erudite intellectual king of football journalism (but actually a florid and grandiloquent twat) - having a depressive breakdown live on air, from 1m10s in...


Oh, that was just great - well worth a watch. Pissed myself laughing at Roney’s stories of “bottler banter” on his way to the Etihad. His still thinks Arsenal will win all their remaining games. I wonder if he has realised that they will get “bottler” rammed down their throats in every game they have left. Opposition fans will have a field day. Whatever happens it will be great to watch.
 
Can anyone enlighten tme on the difference between Swiss rumble/ ramble, Swedish ramble/ rumble etc.
Which ones are " clickbait merchants" and who is the more knowledgeable and neutral one.
 
Can anyone enlighten tme on the difference between Swiss rumble/ ramble, Swedish ramble/ rumble etc.
Which ones are " clickbait merchants" and who is the more knowledgeable and neutral one.
Swiss is the one to read, Swedish is a United fan and the equivalent of arsenals magic hat
 
I zipped to 1:10 … and got as far as ‘…Haaland is paid a great deal more’ before I had to stop.
Ronay has a great voice for newsprint…
Think that Barney, the "poor Lamb", needs therapy.
He is a desperate, bitter and broken man.
It's ironic that Woolwich Arsenal bought the best manager of the 1920's, Herbert Chapman, from little old Huddersfield Town.
Money talked then Barney, as it always has done...
 
Last edited:
I zipped to 1:10 … and got as far as ‘…Haaland is paid a great deal more’ before I had to stop.
Ronay has a great voice for newsprint…
By Ronay's theory its amazing that Liverpool are currently 5th and out of all cups, as Salah and Van Dijk are paid a lot more than all of the players that they play against in the league apart from 1.

United aren't winning anything either despite Casemeiro being in the top 4 highest earners in the league.
 
I’ve directly argued with Delaney before, when you challenge him he has little to no substance behind his arguments. I pressed him on “Sports Washing” and why buying a sports club in the most toxically partisan sport in the world, is a good way to improve your reputation, especially when said club will be challenging the established elite of the sport and ruffling feathers just by improving.

He had no real response and ended up just not responding when I pressed him. They do this all the time, leave cheap remarks and then have nothing behind it.
They really do believe that their opinion matters when in reality they are just fanzine writers who use their position to spew out bile as a way of appeasing the deluded fellow fuckwits that any club that threatens their self entitled place at the top could not have done it genuinely but only by cheating.
Journalists my fuckin arse.
 
According to The BBC "City steal control of the title race"

What does that even mean? They could of used the words like take or gain but steal just pits a negative spin on it.
Fits the cheats narrative they often manipulate into their content, such as during their MOTD highlights and the choice to use the below soundclip when showing a view of Pep.

Most broadcasters usually try to mask out bad, inflammatory or defamatory audio, whereas the BBC seemingly actively chose to add it in themselves here. Make of it what you will..

 
Fits the cheats narrative they often manipulate into their content, such as during their MOTD highlights and the choice to use the below soundclip when showing a view of Pep.

Most broadcasters usually try to mask out bad, inflammatory or defamatory audio, whereas the BBC seemingly actively chose to add it in themselves here. Make of it what you will..


That's not a lot to get upset about really though, is it? Surely he's just stating facts.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top