I'm in another time zone +6 hours BST and was curious that the match reports appeared so late compared to every other ICC game that has been played.
Perhaps because it was Saturday night in Blighty and all the hacks were pissed.
Possibly. But more likely there is a skeleton staff with it being weekend and the game finishing around 1am.
The fact its being debated does show the extreme views of some people though as if the report being uploaded an hour late can offer any indication of bias in any way.
Shirley, you cannot be serious. And yes, I am calling you Shirley!My thoughts also regarding skeleton staff but there was no shortage of live coverage of the Barca vs Madrid game which kicked off later.
Without doubt global click bait vs likkle City.
Shirley, you cannot be serious. And yes, I am calling you Shirley!
Just out of interest if this morning the bbc/guardian/express were accused of bias because they did not have an article now they have one what does that prove?
None of it actually proves anything. It just informs opinion.
Mine is that had the City game been one for which a high click-rate return could have been expected, they would have had something up there sharpish. As it happens, they don't believe that to be the case, so it's not. If there is a bias, it's primarily commercial.
See that I would not argue as similarly we receive more media attention than 95 percent of clubs and really why should an independent organisation make commercial decisions based on anything but commercial interests?
So the fuckers watched a video and wrote a piece in the morning then.Just checked there is an article on it. Is that a full house now from those accused this morning?
Just out of interest if this morning the bbc/guardian/express were accused of bias because they did not have an article now they have one what does that prove?
They wouldn't.