BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 31,644
Spurs 22 shots last night, scum 6, so motd must have shown 3 of spurs’s (including 2 goals) and all of uniteds
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
malg
Well-Known Member
It's true though. They probably could have mentioned wages, but they aren't going to.Sly S News just evaluating the transfers in the window. it came to City and they stated city had spent 57m , it then came to united.
United have spent no money during the transfer window. They have been strengthened by Sanchez joining but that was a "swap deal"
what the fuck.
kevin horlocks wand
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2016
- Messages
- 9,648
It's true though. They probably could have mentioned wages, but they aren't going to.
so we offered 60m in cash if it was a straight swap that makes mikkit worth 60m?
I am sure it was cash plus player.
malg
Well-Known Member
Not been reported that way. Mind you, against Yeovil he looked a steal at £60m......so we offered 60m in cash if it was a straight swap that makes mikkit worth 60m?
I am sure it was cash plus player.
Sly S News just evaluating the transfers in the window. it came to City and they stated city had spent 57m , it then came to united.
United have spent no money during the transfer window. They have been strengthened by Sanchez joining but that was a "swap deal"
what the fuck.
It's bollocks really, they had to pay a £30 million signing on fee and give away a £30 million player to get Sanchez. It's utter delusion to consider it a free transfer.
dodged a bullet I reckon, poor last nightIt's bollocks really, they had to pay a £30 million signing on fee and give away a £30 million player to get Sanchez. It's utter delusion to consider it a free transfer.
Young Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2011
- Messages
- 494
FA taking no action against Fern. Quite rightly. Ref saw it and deemed it accidental.
I was disappointed with Sam Lee's reaction to this incident, I normally respect him but maybe his red tinted specs got in the way on this one?
He previously said ".. in the hands of the FA, and they give very little away. I didn’t see it last night and nobody was talking about it, but the replay looks bad. In my opinion his reaction gives the game away; there wasn’t any contrition, it was immediately a dismissive wave of the hand."
on the FA's decision he posted:
"No ban for Fernandinho. The FA say the ref saw it at the time. He really is terrible"
He sounds disappointed, maybe his mask is slipping following his team's battering at Spurs?
I was disappointed with Sam Lee's reaction to this incident, I normally respect him but maybe his red tinted specs got in the way on this one?
He previously said ".. in the hands of the FA, and they give very little away. I didn’t see it last night and nobody was talking about it, but the replay looks bad. In my opinion his reaction gives the game away; there wasn’t any contrition, it was immediately a dismissive wave of the hand."
on the FA's decision he posted:
"No ban for Fernandinho. The FA say the ref saw it at the time. He really is terrible"
He sounds disappointed, maybe his mask is slipping following his team's battering at Spurs?
The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 8,137
Thats good news.
Yep. Sam lee seems pissed off. He might be friendly to our club but he's still a Rag. They are all twats :)
Yep. Sam lee seems pissed off. He might be friendly to our club but he's still a Rag. They are all twats :)
It's not true at all.It's true though. They probably could have mentioned wages, but they aren't going to.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.