Simon Stone has written a beautiful piece about the Matic signing pmsl.
Play spot the difference if you can ;-)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40770192
I'm not a fan of us being belittled strangely enough.
That sums up the media bias/agenda for me - most of us will defend our club to the hilt, because we are so passionate about them. Those that claim it's a figment of our imagination have a strange view of the world, IMO.
We're talking bias, not agenda.If you consider evidence of backing the club to the hilt, is by writing on a forum there is a media agenda you have a strange view of the world imo.
We're talking bias, not agenda.
No, I consider evidence of a bias against our club by what I see on a daily evidence from certain aspects of the written and broadcast media.If you consider evidence of backing the club to the hilt, is by writing on the forum there is a media bias you have a strange view of the world imo.
No, I consider evidence of a bias against our club by what I see on a daily evidence from certain aspects of the written and broadcast media.
I'm sure you're quite happy to go around in circles, frank but I'm not so catch you later.
They are lesser blues. :-)Well you replied to me in response to my post to Homer who, Imo, was infering people who do not believe in it or somehow lesser blues.
Enjoy your evening
Strange you'd put this point across by writing it on a forum.If you consider evidence of backing the club to the hilt, is by writing on the forum there is a media bias you have a strange view of the world imo.
If you consider evidence of backing the club to the hilt, is by writing on a forum there is a media agenda you have a strange view of the world imo.
Hello everyone, 1st time poster so i'm expecting all the usual rag accusations. The thing that gets me in the Simon Stone article is the paragraph were he states that Spurs want to keep their best players this season. So Kyle Walker wasn't one of their best performers last year.
Cheers blueinsa Long time lurker but never bothered posting.Subtle little dig from the sycophant no doubt.
Welcome to Bluemoon.
RAG ; -)Cheers blueinsa Long time lurker but never bothered posting.
Strange you'd put this point across by writing it on a forum.
Silly boy. Consider the ownership of the media who you argue have no bias. Consider the people they employ. A nd consider for a moment the people who pay for advertising. And then just consider for a moment the preferences of those who consume that media.
Of course there is bias. They are not a public service they are private company's, Silly boy.
Appreciated :) now I feel part of the family.RAG ; -)
Were discussing football bias now against one particular football club. You do not need to tell me the Mail may support for example the conservatives at an election because of its readerships/donors etc. Just because there is other bias does not prove there is bias against us. Its a simple concept.
I have never ssid there is no bias in the media so stop misquoting and try and follow the thread.
Takes one to know oneRAG ; -)
Well done for using the wankest idiom in the English language.Takes one to know one