Media Thread 2017/18

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
SWP's back said:
What’s he done?
Click to expand...

yesterday on espn fc he first game the Laporte move a C+ then while doing the highlights of the city game was saying that we need to protect players everytime they showed a challenge on west brom by our guys....basically mocking pep

I mean he's an idiot
 
ali benarbia's studs said:
they done the same with our highlights at the swamp....seriously?? All the media undermine every other club bar those *****!
Click to expand...

How theyre perceived only goes so far.
Eventually the loss comes and the fall is then even more dramatic because everyone thinks theyre the 2000's manchester united and they paper over how shite they really are.
Deep down we know they have a long way to go to catch us as long as we dont allow ourselves to fall back. So the more it is "dressed up" that they are close means the longer it takes for them to realise the reality.
 
BlueAnorak said:
The WBA players leg going up in the air clearly prevents Fern from hurdling him - he clearly comes down with little force of his leg too - there is no stamping motion. Also the referee clearly saw it.
Click to expand...

Finally. Our player had to change where his foot was going to go at the last second as their players leg was unnaturally high and Fernadiho took late avoiding action. It was a coming together, no more. Even with intent going off Madley's interpretations if the laws it would only have been yellow at best!
 
According to SSN we pulled out of the deal for Mahrez causing him to go AWOL from Leicester! There was no deal to pull out of.
 
There's an article in the DT this morning highlighting the 'tackles' we have witnessed over the last few games. The general thrust seems to be that referees need to do more to protect players. Well what about applying the laws and issuing red cards for what the entire world can see is a sending off offence!
 
All the media and I include all forms of media are against us, both written and on the TV. The 1 and only reason for this hatred of our club, is that we have the cheek to break up the so called big 4 clubs in this country. I mean their beloved rags, Arsenal, Liverpool, and Chelsea. I don't remember such hatred of Chelsea, when Abramovich bought Chelsea as there is with us.
Has anyone noticed that everytime Alan Shearer has anything nice to say about us he is saying it through gritted teeth. The same applies to most of the pundits on BT sports especially M.Owen. I think it is about time that both of these channels get rid of these two faced presenters, or tell them to change their attitudes or they will be sacked.
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
There's an article in the DT this morning highlighting the 'tackles' we have witnessed over the last few games. The general thrust seems to be that referees need to do more to protect players. Well what about applying the laws and issuing red cards for what the entire world can see is a sending off offence!
Click to expand...
I personally don't blame the refs. They can't be expected to see everything. As I said in another thread, I firmly believe they guess at a lot of their decisions, or they use a built in prejudice, based on newspaper articles and other media bullshit. Any match going fan can see that ref's give decisions on how much reaction a player gives to a tackle - all the rolling around etc.

Some of the recent ones v us:

1. Sane - at full speed was difficult to see, even the commentators missed it, as did I. The replay showed a fucking shocker though.
2. Diaz - the ref's view was blocked by Barry (so God knows why he even gave a Yellow - well, he gave it for Diaz (honestly) rolling around, and our player's reactions). On replay though you could see it was a shocker.
3. Kane and Alli - shockers both, and again even worse on replay.
4. McLean - the I rent was there, and even if he didn't catch the player, it needs looking at.

The big issue here is the ridiculous rule that if the ref has 'seen' it, it can't be reviewed. It's high time the fucking FA realised that these things need to be reviewed. Someone needs to take retrospective action on potential career ending tackles - but I won't hold my breath.
 
rossie said:
its just not real, sly sports are adamant the rags havent spent anything this window, so are they saying mikki wasnt worth anything ? talk about bending the truth , are the rags fans truly buying into this ?
Click to expand...

Just a VAT matter. When there is a barter transaction both parties have to include in their VAT return the value of the goods or services they have sold. The market value of the goods sold (the player) must be quantified and declared. So somewhere both sides had a value on their player they were selling and they will be including this in their next VAT return. It matters not that no cash was exchanged, there was a value to the deal.
 
I mentioned this a while ago but it's more and more evident by the week. The rags top brass, Charlton and his buddies used to be constantly captured by the media applauding each goal , revelling like pigs in shit every achievement by bacons teams, lauding over the swamp like some sort of roman emperors as they smashed everyone into the turf . You never see them anymore, where are they now their club needs their support? Executive glory hunters
 
Last edited:
blueju said:
I mentioned this a while ago but it's more and more evident by the week. The rags top brass, Charlton and his buddies used to be constantly captured by the media applauding each goal , revelling like pigs in shit every achievement by bacons teams, lauding over the swamp like some sort of roman emperors as they smashed everyone into the turf . You never see them anymore, where are they now their club needs their support? Executive glory hunters
Click to expand...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/27337659
 
malg said:
I personally don't blame the refs. They can't be expected to see everything. As I said in another thread, I firmly believe they guess at a lot of their decisions, or they use a built in prejudice, based on newspaper articles and other media bullshit. Any match going fan can see that ref's give decisions on how much reaction a player gives to a tackle - all the rolling around etc.

Some of the recent ones v us:

1. Sane - at full speed was difficult to see, even the commentators missed it, as did I. The replay showed a fucking shocker though.
2. Diaz - the ref's view was blocked by Barry (so God knows why he even gave a Yellow - well, he gave it for Diaz (honestly) rolling around, and our player's reactions). On replay though you could see it was a shocker.
3. Kane and Alli - shockers both, and again even worse on replay.
4. McLean - the I rent was there, and even if he didn't catch the player, it needs looking at.

The big issue here is the ridiculous rule that if the ref has 'seen' it, it can't be reviewed. It's high time the fucking FA realised that these things need to be reviewed. Someone needs to take retrospective action on potential career ending tackles - but I won't hold my breath.
Click to expand...

I think you'd have to add Kane's to the blocked too - that was the one which the ref was turning/ducking and possibly didn't pick up the exact contact other than it being late.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top