Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
JRockBlues said:
I seem to remember us playing on a Saturday then Tuesday while they played Saturday/Thursday at one point. Does that not count as a 2 dy break also?
Click to expand...

The whole thing is laughably wrong.

Easiest/Hardest Christmas schedules (Not including our postponed game which changes us from 2 to 2.6)

1612649897953.png

Number of 5+ day breaks between games this season :

Liverpool 4
Manchester City 1

(By the end of February this will be 6 vs. 1 as we make up our Everton game and play cup games)

Days per game this season :

Liverpool 4.8
Manchester City 4.1

Days between last game of 19/20 and first game of 20/21

Liverpool - 34
Manchester City internationals - 19
Manchester City non-internationals - 33

Why the distinction between our internationals and non-internationals?

Well that's because while Liverpool got a full 7 weeks between their last game of 19/20 and their first league game of 20/21. That allowed them to have a full month of preseason with 3 friendlies and a trip to Austria before their first league game.

Manchester City got 5 weeks between seasons...except the last 2 of those weeks were taken up with the September international break. So 90% of our squad were playing less than 3 weeks after the loss to Lyon and not only did we not have any preseason friendlies, our first league game was 2 days after the first full squad training session of the season.

This is why Pep was so ready to talk about it, and why he said "They have forgotten. We have not forgotten". We had a shit schedule and he and his staff will have lost a lot of sleep trying to plan their way through it.

The fact we managed to get through those first few months of the season without ending our chances of silverware, with no preparation at all compared to the teams we faced, with 8 players out injured or with covid at the beginning of the season...it's absolutely incredible.

I don't know why this has irked me as much as it has, but Klopp's lie, and the James Pearce propaganda about "he only meant 2 days!!!" really annoyed me more than their usual bullshit.
 
Last edited:
franksinatra said:
Which article was this?

I read an article by Jack Gaughan and it included a fixture list of matches, as was requested by @eversince 76, and highlighted we only had 7 days off.
Click to expand...
Added in by the production journalists so like headlines and pictures, nothing to do with him. But nowhere in his text. And nowhere dies he point out or address the fact that Klopp was factually wrong
 
domalino said:
The whole thing is laughably wrong.

Easiest/Hardest Christmas schedules (Not including our postponed game which changes us from 2 to 2.6)

View attachment 9814

Number of 5+ day breaks between games this season :

Liverpool 4
Manchester City 1

(By the end of February this will be 6 vs. 1 as we make up our Everton game and play cup games)

Days per game this season :

Liverpool 4.8
Manchester City 4.1

Days between last game of 19/20 and first game of 20/21

Liverpool - 34
Manchester City internationals - 19
Manchester City non-internationals - 33

Why the distinction between our internationals and non-internationals?

Well that's because while Liverpool got a full 7 weeks between their last game of 19/20 and their first league game of 20/21. That allowed them to have a full month of preseason with 3 friendlies and a trip to Austria before their first league game.

Manchester City got 5 weeks between seasons...except the last 2 of those weeks were taken up with the September international break. So 90% of our squad were playing less than 3 weeks after the loss to Lyon and not only did we not have any preseason friendlies, our first league game was 2 days after the first full squad training session of the season.

This is why Pep was so ready to talk about it, and why he said "They have forgotten. We have not forgotten". We had a shit schedule and he and his staff will have lost a lot of sleep trying to plan their way through it.

The fact we managed to get through those first few months of the season without ending our chances of silverware, with no preparation at all compared to the teams we faced, with 8 players out injured or with covid at the beginning of the season...it's absolutely incredible.

I don't know why this has irked me as much as it has, but Klopp's lie, and the James Pearce propaganda about "he only meant 2 days!!!" really annoyed me more than their usual bullshit.
Click to expand...
Excellent post. I applaud you!
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
I understand the overall PR strategy, as frustrating as it can appear sometimes, which is to keep a low profile and not get dragged into slanging matches. It's been pointed out that if you rush out statements to deny or counter something, then fail to do that for something else, the media will take that as a passive admission of guilt ("City refuse to deny..."). I also suspect that our owner is sensitive to potential criticism of the UAE's pretty compliant media, if we started throwing our weight around.

But something like this, which is blatantly false and where Klopp is simply being provocative, should get a factual response. It doesn't have to be aggressive, just to point out that we've actually played 2 games more than them, that they had 8 days gap between the game on the 19th and their 'Boxing Day' game on the 27th, plus another 9 days between their FA Cup game (when they faced an U-18 Villa team) and their game against United. Then the media can't ignore it and it turns the focus back on Klopp, making him look like the dishonest, whining cretin he is.
Click to expand...

we need to have unofficial voices on the payroll, that’s what the red lot do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.