I hope you are not contributing to Guardian football? The best thing we can do right now is to stop all City comment.
They can't have a legitimate football web-site if it does not include Manchester City and is perceived as biased.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media Thread 2020/21
- Thread starter mccity
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
They can't have a legitimate football web-site if it does not include Manchester City and is perceived as biased.
I'd love to see this 'Measure of Success' co-efficient that they use, but I suspect, like most of their output, that it's just random collection of words plucked out of thin air.
In a way they're being complimentary because they are saying, the bigger the team, the more successful it has to be, so saying that x or y is not enough for City and they should be winning more means they regard us in very high esteem.
In a way they're being complimentary because they are saying, the bigger the team, the more successful it has to be, so saying that x or y is not enough for City and they should be winning more means they regard us in very high esteem.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
You can be reassured. I haven't bought a newspaper for years and never comment on any of their websites. I do think it is important to call out fake news when it rears its ugly head though. It is not a left wing or right wing political issue. I see the Guardian and the Daily Mail as two of the most dishonest news organisations in the world and they have huge audiences online. They are both fuelling an atmosphere of hate in the general population, and not just with their coverage of City.I hope you are not contributing to Guardian football? The best thing we can do right now is to stop all City comment.
They can't have a legitimate football web-site if it does not include Manchester City and is perceived as biased.
You can be reassured. I haven't bought a newspaper for years and never comment on any of their websites. I do think it is important to call out fake news when it rears its ugly head though. It is not a left wing or right wing political issue. I see the Guardian and the Daily Mail as two of the most dishonest news organisations in the world and they have huge audiences online. They are both fuelling an atmosphere of hate in the general population, and not just with their coverage of City.
Good. But come midnight tonight I bet you there will be a 500 plus comments from City fans on the Guardian match report.
Any City fan should delete their account. They are anti-City - politically and commercially.
i went to rotherham
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 629
The criteria is based on football beginning in 1992 and ending in 2008I’ve just been reading the supposed shortlist for The Premier League Hall of Fame 23 man shortlist. There are 5 players on it who played for City past their peak and aren’t on the list for what they did at City.
I was shocked when looking at the list there was no Kompany, captained City to 4 PL titles, however Vidic, Adams, Campbell, Terry, Ferdinand are all on it.
Also no Silva, 10 years service, also 4 PL titles.
Finally no Sergio!!!! Scored the most iconic PL goal of all time, most hat tricks, leading foreign scorer and also FOUR PL TITLES.In ahead of him, Les Ferdinand, Robbie Fowler, Michael Owen & Van Persie who combined won 2 PL titles and have all scored less than him in the league.
Le Tissier is in the list who was a fantastic player & was loyal to Southampton but I am wondering what the criteria is?
Maybe with time they will add City players but those 3 should surely be on the shortlist now.
Gremlin
Well-Known Member
Actually the criteria is based on players who had retired by 2020 so Sergio, Merlin, Vinnie, Yaya don't (yet) qualify.The criteria is based on football beginning in 1992 and ending in 2008
I see the independent have written 2 articles slagging us both off (City and PSG), Tony Evans and Miguel Delaney surprise surprise.
So I'm going to assume neither of them will be watching tonight?
This is an amazing article from Evans.
The first line of battle in any appeal to CAS is the composition of the three-judge panel. City nominated Andrew McDougal, QC, a Paris-based partner at White and Case international law firm. McDougal is the former chairman of the company’s operations council for Europe, the Middle East and Africa. White and Case have an office in Abu Dhabi and two of its biggest clients are Etisalat and Etihad. The case revolved around these City sponsors.
Under CAS rules, “arbitrators must be independent, [and have] no particular connection with any of the parties.” McDougal never acted personally for either of the sponsors and his impartiality is beyond question
I'm looking forward to seeing United's embarrassment of riches against Roma on Thursday Night.
Keep your eye on on the Daily United, United v Roma headline, tomorrow.
Keep your eye on on the Daily United, United v Roma headline, tomorrow.
The £1BILLION game: PSG and Man City are football's biggest spenders and their embarrassment of riches will be on full display in Paris tonight... from £167m Kylian Mbappe to a City defence worth £191m
So the paperboy delivers the Sun to you everyday and not the Guardian?Good. But come midnight tonight I bet you there will be a 500 plus comments from City fans on the Guardian match report.
Any City fan should delete their account. They are anti-City - politically and commercially.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.