We know the difference. City are not viewed as being owned by an individual but being owned by a state.
That is the crux of most of City's problems in the media and its one where the club has completely failed.
Whether the club is actuslly owned by Abu Dhabi or Mansour as an individual (and I've seen even people like
@Prestwich_Blue say we are effectively owned by the AD executive council) is largely irrelevant, they allowed the club to be tied to the state from day 1 and that brings with it all the baggage of that state.
We weren't bought by Sheikh Mansour the individual. We were bought by Abu Dhabi United Group. Leicester and Chelsea were bought by individuals.
The Abu Dhabi state airline sponsors us. Leicester are sponsored by the personal company of the srivaddhanaprabha family.
Our chairman is the Head of a state owned investment fund, he sits on a bunch of government boards and councils. Leocester's chairman was the owners son.
The club failed to separate Sheikh Mansour as the owner and Abu Dhabi as the owner.
You look at Abramovic and hes front and centre of things at Chelsea. He went to every game for 10 years, he is known to make decisions personally. Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha went to almost every game before he died at a Leicester City game. He was publicly visible, in press releases and seen in public at club events etc.
Mansour issues a press release when we win the league and is snapped by a club photographer when the squad flies out to Abu Dhabi every couple of years and it only gets seen by City fans. There is 1 photograph of Mansour at a game that is used a decade after it was taken.
People believe the club is owned by a state because the club and its owner have done almost nothing to dissuade anyone from that idea.
And who knows if they even want to? They have done nothing to stop people linking the two. If they really wanted they could have a lawyer or PR person contact every single newspaper that says the club is owned by Abu Dhabi and make them correct it. They don't want to.
States are easy to hate. They all do terrible things and there's millions of people motivated to investigate them. They're on a global stage full stop.
Individuals are much harder to target. Abramovic is a horrendous person with a lot of blood on his hands, but its all rumours and its all very very small time compared to the bad deeds of even the smallest state.
As long as the club is linked to a state we are going to be hated by the press and treated completely differently to clubs owned by individuals. I would argue there's really not much point in caring about it anymore, particularly as the club doesn't.