gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
It would be libel mate, as it’s been broadcast. Don’t think the defence of honest opinion can apply as to raise that defence the statement needs to indicate, whether in general or specific terms, the basis of the opinion, which he did not.After the vile out pouting of bitter jealousy the red apologist needs taking down .Go get him City.Slander andputting us on the same moral level as that Russian twat.The time is right nail him and all the other click bait twats will be shitting themselves.Do it.
Anyway, the game’s just kicked off!