There was a mention on the forum somewhere that the meeting between Syria and uae was on behalf/sponsored by the UN.Manchester City's owner's commercial strategy is vindicated as financial success has followed the trophies.
Those financial journalists who cannot accept facts demonstrate have no integrity, and have been shown to have no integrity. This has been an emphatic victory for Manchester City's fanbase but the war will continue, and our opponents will continue to fight dirty.
If you want fair coverage of Manchester City then you will have to provide that coverage yourself and boycott the scab press in doing so. That is a pointed message to those Manchester City fans who still contribute in the Guardian whilst the newspaper keeps up a relentless campaign against City who this weekend considered it appropriate in their football match report to repeat the claims of a British MP who questioned whether City's Arab owner was "a fit and proper person to be owning a football club, saying it would be good to see the back of him."
Britain is the home of militarism, and the Guardian regards Britain as a leader of the free-world. It's sickening to read in a time of war so please do not support it by commenting in it. That is how you monetise criticism of Manchester City.
I can’t find any news item saying that though, has anyone got a link to something that shows that to be the case?
if it is sponsored by the UN then they can all STFU, ( cf uk govt meeting Sinn Fein).
if it was part of a wider Arab led progression on Syria… hmm maybe ok.
if it was just the UAE off their own bat… that’s not a particularly good look.