Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Super Sancho etc… seem to be the headlines tonight! Would that be the same if we drew 2-2 with Leeds at home?
Is that his second goal of the season? He must still be twenty-odd behind our Viking, but hey, if a Rag can kick a ball straight at the Swamp it's breaking news.

Compare that to the ten column inches the women's game got last night. I've read the entire article and it seems Greenwood made two great tackles, but that was the sum total of our efforts over 120mins. If anyone wasn't aware of the slant the RDAHMeedya put on football reporting people would think we never laid a boot on the ball.
 
BBC Lincolnshire played Poundland Pep's interview this morning following his £750m teams 'stunning' comeback against plucky manager-less Leeds.

Lucky if they even read out our results, let alone play a Pep interview.
Seems the BBC drench the nation's entire airwaves with pro-Rag propaganda. Goebbels could have learned a trick or two from them. I will relish the day when the BBC are forced to ask for a 'voluntary' subscription' rather than one where they twist my arm up my back! But then, Sky and BT propaganda hasn't abated despite non-Rags 'n non-Dippers buying in! Perhaps they'd come clean then and brazenly re-brand as RedShirt Broadcasting Cunts.
 
Just seen Jason Burt (telegragh) lauding Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney's 'investment' in Wrexham FC and the surrounding area. Says it's fantastic and has re-built a club that has sooooo much history.

This was moments after he slagged off City and questioned our spending!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do they actually listen to themselves??????
Burt and Reynolds were looking to do a TV series, a reality TV show. They hit on English football. They asked friends and one suggested Wrexham.
It's great for Wrexham but when the ratings start to fall, what then for the club?
 
Doesn't 14 years prove the PL are unfit to self regulate themselves?
I suspect the first fourteen weeks, setting aside the initial hullabaloo, proved they were a bunch of tossers, concerned more with revenue streams, media rights, and 'the brand' rather than the 'good of the game'!
 
Even he said we were "obviously guilty".
Yes. Bad call by Martin on the back of no evidence that he had seen. Did the papers’ lawyers not tell the journos that Der Spiegel‘s purported reproduction of emails had little or no probative value? Any journo that had consulted a lawyer could have produced a really good story counter to the herd’s pile on. Martin missed a trick there.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.