GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
100% of fans think Dan Sheldon is a pathetic, inconsequential prick.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media thread 2022/23
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
100% of fans think Dan Sheldon is a pathetic, inconsequential prick.
P
P
PPT
Guest
Edited for accuracy.100% of fans know Dan Sheldon is a pathetic, inconsequential prick.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
A poll which doesn't even say how many people responded and how it was carried out is totally without value.I clicked it so you don't have to.
https://archive.ph/jJaLV
Nothing about method so I suppose it is as informative as Nick Harris's Twitter polls,
Gobshiight
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Mar 2013
- Messages
- 1,007
A classic.
Probably the most cynical attack on City so far
What a ****
nmc
Well-Known Member
A nobody who has almost as much experience at TK Maxx as in football journalism
View attachment 80892View attachment 80893
His LinkedIn profile omits to say he’s a ****.
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,268
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
There surely can’t be any self respecting, match going blue who still subscribes to the athletic? Surely?His LinkedIn profile omits to say he’s a ****.
The handful who still believe Lee are all overseas fans
Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,372
50% and 60% etc, of "our followers/readers", not PL fans, that should say.
Not sure it matters though, it does seem like the rest of the PL fans think they know what it's about(when they clearly don't) and also that City are definitely guilty.
Newcastle fans included sadly, convincing themselves they're not like City and they were always bigger so it wouldn't be the same. Which is utter bollocks, they've never been bigger than City, same as Spurs and Chelsea(who do the same thing, about pre Abramovich)... All top 10 clubs in size/history, no more than that, same as City and there's no shame in that. Arsenal weren't as big as Liverpool and United either until the PL era, it became a big 3 thanks to the PL broadcasting money and Sky favouritism.
Not sure it matters though, it does seem like the rest of the PL fans think they know what it's about(when they clearly don't) and also that City are definitely guilty.
Newcastle fans included sadly, convincing themselves they're not like City and they were always bigger so it wouldn't be the same. Which is utter bollocks, they've never been bigger than City, same as Spurs and Chelsea(who do the same thing, about pre Abramovich)... All top 10 clubs in size/history, no more than that, same as City and there's no shame in that. Arsenal weren't as big as Liverpool and United either until the PL era, it became a big 3 thanks to the PL broadcasting money and Sky favouritism.
Last edited:
Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,372
On another note, I was looking through talksport's youtube channel and noticed almost every City related topic that Simon Jordan covers, has a thumbnail of him grimacing like he's in pain.
If I could be bothered, I'd collect a load of them, crop them and then make a gif animation of them all. To see if he does look like some kind of grotesque goblin straining for a big shit, like I suspect he will. :)
If I could be bothered, I'd collect a load of them, crop them and then make a gif animation of them all. To see if he does look like some kind of grotesque goblin straining for a big shit, like I suspect he will. :)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.