oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
WTF.I always thought he was Oakie
I should borrow Balateli`s shirt "why always me" !!!
WTF.I always thought he was Oakie
Well thank you, you "ageist" twat ;)Nowhere near old enough to be oakie
Amen, broWhy do some of these talk like black New Yorkers? Bro, Yo Yo Yo, ffs they’re just Plastic’s putting on a show for plastic’s. Absolutely pathetic.
this is one of the by-products of a league and associated media that gets to big for its boots - it just plods on with what may have paid the bills, or satisfies a powerful lobby, and trots out tropes and cliches. They look down their nose at 'outsiders', whether that be smaller UK outlets or journalists or those from abroad (who couldnt possibly understand our game, could they). Yes, the freshness of coverage from other sources can be a good thing.It's ridiculous that some in the media tried to find a negative angle on a 4-0 home win. Yesterday I couldn't go so I had to watch the US broadcast coverage (NBC) on a dodgy stream. The overall tone was positive and aspirational. Not just the City coverage but the way they covered all the PL games. I hadn't watched US coverage for years but I found it a breath of fresh air. What came across was a love of football with no bias and the tactical analysis was also miles ahead of SKY and BBC.
What has happened to the UK sports media? They should be celebrating our national sport but everything is distorted and reported through a negative filter. Coverage is dominated by the collapse of United. I accept it's a big story but most fans in the country don't support United. For example the Everton/Villa match was reported through the stale Lampard/Gerrard narrative. Who gives a shit? The whole UK media industry is fixated on the past.
Complacency is the name of the game for so many so-called football journalists. They are staggeringly lazy. Every day they twist and spin quotes from Pep in his press conference. But fans can watch Pep's conference for themselves so it is easy for us to see how the narrative is distorted.this is one of the by-products of a league and associated media that gets to big for its boots - it just plods on with what may have paid the bills, or satisfies a powerful lobby, and trots out tropes and cliches. They look down their nose at 'outsiders', whether that be smaller UK outlets or journalists or those from abroad (who couldnt possibly understand our game, could they). Yes, the freshness of coverage from other sources can be a good thing.
Much as I despise what these fanboys represent there is no doubt it is a very clever business model.Fans who don't go to the match giving commentary for the fans who don't go to the match, genius :)
Oh and they are going to talk about the scum again20 fucking minutes of bollox on sky transfer show about the scum dull as fuck and clueless. Do they also get paid for the amount of time they say manchester united sorry 23