Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stiff Little Wingers said:
100% agree with you mate. There's 2 articles in the Guardian saying much the same. The bitterness and jealousy runs so deep.
This has been a magical era for City and English football - they never, ever mention how Pep has revolutionised the game in this country which is something the rags and German rags etc have not done
Click to expand...
Absolutely. There are plenty of teams all the way down the pyramid that have forsaken hit and hope hoofball and now play the ball out from the back.
 
M12Blue said:
'Too be considered a true great he needs to score 4 repeatedly'
Click to expand...
Many a true word spoken in jest, dear fellow Blue! Coming to a tabloid soon, maybe a follow up to the Jonathan Wilson piece in 'The Grauniad' even?!

Speaking of which, I don't know why we don't just get on with it and change our name to 'Manchester City, but..'

Wilson's article is nothing more than today's latest iteration of the media theme that began in 2008 when Sheikh Mansour bought the club. No matter what we do, or how well we do it, there always has to be a qualification, to keep us 'in our place', to tell us we're 'not quite there yet..'

Since the takeover it's been incessant, including:
* 'You may have a rich owner but wait until he gets bored'
* 'You may have won the FA Cup but you're not a top team until you win the title'
* 'You may have won the title but until you win it back-to-back you won't be a great team'
* 'You may have won the greatest number of points and scored the greatest number of goals in modern history but until you win the Champions League you'll never be truly great'
* 'You may have the greatest coach ever creating a team that plays the most innovative, expansive and attractive football ever but until you have the cachet and 'Istry of Liverpool and ManU you'll never be a top, top club'
..and so on and so on, ad infinitum.

Wilson's (and others') 'argument' is facile in the extreme. Responding to competitive excellence, in any field of human endeavour requires, at the very least, a RESPONSE. Don't whinge about things being unfair.. get on and do something about it, sharpen up your act and begin the process of emulating and (hopefully) exceeding that level of excellence you are up against. He offers nothing by way of HOW other teams might do things in response to what our club has achieved particularly under Guardiola.

But like so many in the UK sports media, Wilson would rather bang on like 'Kevin the Teenager' that everything is 'so unfair!' than give full and proper credit to what Guardiola and the team on and off the pitch have been achieving and continue to achieve.

And as local legal-eagle Judge Parry said (somewhat presciently?!) at the start of the 20th century, 'Don't tell us what you are going to do. Do it. For that is the Manchester habit..'
 
johnevans said:
Many a true word spoken in jest, dear fellow Blue! Coming to a tabloid soon, maybe a follow up to the Jonathan Wilson piece in 'The Grauniad' even?!

Speaking of which, I don't know why we don't just get on with it and change our name to 'Manchester City, but..'

Wilson's article is nothing more than today's latest iteration of the media theme that began in 2008 when Sheikh Mansour bought the club. No matter what we do, or how well we do it, there always has to be a qualification, to keep us 'in our place', to tell us we're 'not quite there yet..'

Since the takeover it's been incessant, including:
* 'You may have a rich owner but wait until he gets bored'
* 'You may have won the FA Cup but you're not a top team until you win the title'
* 'You may have won the title but until you win it back-to-back you won't be a great team'
* 'You may have won the greatest number of points and scored the greatest number of goals in modern history but until you win the Champions League you'll never be truly great'
* 'You may have the greatest coach ever creating a team that plays the most innovative, expansive and attractive football ever but until you have the cachet and 'Istry of Liverpool and ManU you'll never be a top, top club'
..and so on and so on, ad infinitum.

Wilson's (and others') 'argument' is facile in the extreme. Responding to competitive excellence, in any field of human endeavour requires, at the very least, a RESPONSE. Don't whinge about things being unfair.. get on and do something about it, sharpen up your act and begin the process of emulating and (hopefully) exceeding that level of excellence you are up against. He offers nothing by way of HOW other teams might do things in response to what our club has achieved particularly under Guardiola.

But like so many in the UK sports media, Wilson would rather bang on like 'Kevin the Teenager' that everything is 'so unfair!' than give full and proper credit to what Guardiola and the team on and off the pitch have been achieving and continue to achieve.

And as local legal-eagle Judge Parry said (somewhat presciently?!) at the start of the 20th century, 'Don't tell us what you are going to do. Do it. For that is the Manchester habit..'
Click to expand...
Someone on this morning's pod was claiming Haaland could actually be bad for Pep. Apparently if we win the CL, everyone will claim he could only win it with Messi and Haaland.
 
prestonibbo_mcfc said:
So what about his salary. The top in their field get top wages, in all walks of life.
Click to expand...
According to this website, https://salarysport.com/football/premier-league/manchester-city-f.c./ & https://salarysport.com/football/premier-league/manchester-united-f.c./

Haaland is on the same wage as Sancho according to that site.
Haaland in his last match, coincidentally against Sancho, scores 3 goals and gives 2 assists.

Sancho in his entire Man Utd career of 47 games, has 8 goals and 3 assists.
So ones an attacker and ones a winger… you’d have expected Sancho to have less goals, but more assists…

I think the media needs to focus on someone not doing much …
 
This is the Guardians take on the beautiful football we played yesterday.

Or is there something more insidious at work, a financial determinism that, by relegating football itself behind foreign-policy objectives and profit, erodes the game?

A world in which 6-3 wins feel unexceptional is not a comfortable one.
Click to expand...

www.theguardian.com

Manchester City’s continuing dominance feels uncomfortably routine | Jonathan Wilson

United were lucky to lose the derby by only three in a game that posed important questions about the state of football
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
citymad said:
Funny how we never saw woeful and shocking journalism when the rags and dippers were dominating everything. Shame on you Wilson and shame on the college that granted you (if they ever did) a degree in journalism.
Click to expand...

Didnt liverpool get press like this a few weeks ago after their 9-nil ?
 
mexico1970 said:
This is the Guardians take on the beautiful football we played yesterday.



www.theguardian.com

Manchester City’s continuing dominance feels uncomfortably routine | Jonathan Wilson

United were lucky to lose the derby by only three in a game that posed important questions about the state of football
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
Revel in their pain. Scouse twat Evans is currently unemployed and it won't be long before a lot of these bitter clowns are as well. I do wish we'd deny hospitality to some of these wankers tho.
 
Jonathan Wilson being classic Jonathan Wilson in today's Guardian.

What a sad, bitter little weasel that wanker is.


"City have won four of the past five titles. They have scored 20 times in four home league games this season. The question English football has to ask itself is: are they doing this because of the unique gifts of this particular manager and this particular set of players (and perhaps the ineptitude or questionable priorities of certain other owners who might financially compete)? Is this a golden age, like Arsenal in the 30s, Liverpool in the 80s or United in the 90s, that will be celebrated as such by decades to come?

Or is there something more insidious at work, a financial determinism that, by relegating football itself behind foreign-policy objectives and profit, erodes the game?"
 
Just pmd him and also followed up my tweet requesting the amount of the agents fees and his source of info. Otherwise it’s not journalism just gossip. Next move, if I am not banned, will be to point out his irresponsibility if he publishes unsubstantiated stuff. Don’t usually let it bother me too much but this guy needs to be taught a lesson
 
norman said:
Just pmd him and also followed up my tweet requesting the amount of the agents fees and his source of info. Otherwise it’s not journalism just gossip. Next move, if I am not banned, will be to point out his irresponsibility if he publishes unsubstantiated stuff. Don’t usually let it bother me too much but this guy needs to be taught a lesson
Click to expand...

he needs ignoring.

his entire act depends on people biting when he writes/tweets. Just block him.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
It’s Big Clubitis. You play for the red clubs and your players get elevated above everyone else, no matter how shit they are. Rashford, Lingard, TAA, Sancho, AWB, Nunez are all world stars we've been told.
Click to expand...
‘Twas ever thus. Look at all the bang average rags who’ve played for England ….. Cleverly, Welbeck, Wes Brown, Phil Neville, Kieran Richardson, Smalling etc etc

Most of them were barely adequate top flight players, the kind of guys who might just about get a regular game for a team fighting relegation yet they were elevated way above the status their ability deserved by the Utd bias endemic in the English game
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top