micah v corluka.

[adamgregory]

Hoping Boateng will prove to be much better than both

This, Boateng will be better than both combined but to answer the OP's question it will have to be Micah.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Why all the love for Corluka ?

He's one of the slowest players I've seen and defensively isn't great at all.

Only thing of note he ever did was that fantastic block in the derby - the one which we won with Geeeeeeeeooooooooooooo's goal.

 

[manny]

Corluka defo, I was talking to a spurs fan down there and he said he'd swap for Richards said charlies slow. Big lability Micah

 

[masterwig]

I liked Corluka but he wasn't half slow getting back with that stupid shuffling run he does.

To be honest, neither would get in the Chelsea or rag team and that is the kind of level both City and Spurs have to be looking to get to now.

 

[Anonymous]

corluka

i loved his run

were is that poster by the way?

 

[King Geedorah]

I liked Corluka but he wasn't half slow getting back with that stupid shuffling run he does.

To be honest, neither would get in the Chelsea or rag team and that is the kind of level both City and Spurs have to be looking to get to now.

Richards would get into United's team I imagine, they're weak at right back especially.

 

[davymcfc]

corluka, micah can be an idiot at times.

 

[Marvin]

I prefer Micah.

Never rated Corluka as a defender. Good technically, but lacks aggression, and switches off. I know micah sometimes loses concentration as well

 

[pee dubya]

Both are flawed. It basically depends if you prefer technical ability over physicality.

I can't really decide.

 

[gman07]

Both are flawed. It basically depends if you prefer technical ability over physicality.

I can't really decide.

I agree... both has their strengths and weaknesses so its hard to choose...